Recently, I’ve been flooded with various "annualized 50%+" financial management strategies. I decided to experience a leading lending protocol myself. To be honest, everyone knows the surface pros and cons, but some more painful questions are rarely thought through by most people.
First, let’s talk about returns. The protocol’s advertised annualized yield is usually calculated based on token rewards converted at the current market price. Sounds good, but there’s a big trap—massive rewards are released all at once, which will inevitably cause a price dump. Imagine if all users in the ecosystem sell their token rewards; can the token price stay healthy? The returns you calculate might look impressive on paper, but when it’s time to cash out, they’ve already shrunk significantly. Instead of viewing these rewards as guaranteed cash flow, it’s better to see them as options that could be either cashable or devalued.
Next is the Gas fee trap. To optimize returns or control risks, you’ll frequently perform operations—adding collateral, withdrawing interest, re-investing... Although on low-fee chains like BSC, a single Gas fee is cheap, the cumulative cost of operations adds up to real money. Especially for small fund users, these fees can eat up most of the profits. Sometimes, doing nothing and holding back is actually a smarter choice.
More importantly, systemic risks should be watched out for. Collateral in lending protocols is mostly mainstream tokens, whose prices tend to move in sync with the overall crypto market. In extreme market conditions, your collateral can shrink in value, and other DeFi protocols relying on these collaterals might also face issues. In the worst case, even the stablecoins you use for mining could be at risk. This isn’t just a problem with one protocol; it’s a common flaw in the entire DeFi Jenga tower.
Don’t forget governance risks. Although these protocols carry the DAO label, early on, actual decision-making power often still resides with the development team. A radical governance vote—like sharply increasing borrowing rates—can instantly invalidate your entire strategy. Such incidents have happened in DeFi before.
Ultimately, these protocols are powerful tools. To master them, you need a risk management mindset, not just a speculative one.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketMonk
· 01-10 07:48
It's just wealth on paper; when it comes to actual realization, it's a completely different story.
View OriginalReply0
SerRugResistant
· 01-10 07:41
Paper gains are all lies; when the coin dumps, it's all useless.
Trading fees eat up most of the small position profits, and that's true.
Systemic risks are impossible to prevent; DeFi is just a Jenga tower.
DAO governance rights are still in the team's hands, don't be fooled.
This thing is just a tool designed for risk managers.
Real money-makers avoid these high-yield traps.
Accumulated Gas fees are the biggest hidden killer.
Collateral devaluation can cause stablecoins to collapse in an instant.
Why do I feel like everyone is just fooling themselves?
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlord
· 01-10 07:40
The phrase "paper wealth" is brilliant; I just got scared of the coin price crashing and dumping.
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyIssues
· 01-10 07:39
It sounds like many people are paying the IQ tax of Gas fees.
View OriginalReply0
GweiObserver
· 01-10 07:35
Paper gains are all lies; by the time you actually cash out, they've already shrunk. This is really heartbreaking.
View OriginalReply0
Hash_Bandit
· 01-10 07:28
ngl the 50%+ apy stuff is just token pump theater... seen this movie before during the difficulty epochs of 2017 lol
Reply0
StealthDeployer
· 01-10 07:26
Paper gains are all lies; you realize it the moment you dump.
The ones who truly make money never talk about it publicly.
DAO governance is a trap; early development teams call the shots.
Gas fees eat up half the profits; small funds can't play.
The entire DeFi is a Jenga tower; once it collapses, everything falls apart.
Recently, I’ve been flooded with various "annualized 50%+" financial management strategies. I decided to experience a leading lending protocol myself. To be honest, everyone knows the surface pros and cons, but some more painful questions are rarely thought through by most people.
First, let’s talk about returns. The protocol’s advertised annualized yield is usually calculated based on token rewards converted at the current market price. Sounds good, but there’s a big trap—massive rewards are released all at once, which will inevitably cause a price dump. Imagine if all users in the ecosystem sell their token rewards; can the token price stay healthy? The returns you calculate might look impressive on paper, but when it’s time to cash out, they’ve already shrunk significantly. Instead of viewing these rewards as guaranteed cash flow, it’s better to see them as options that could be either cashable or devalued.
Next is the Gas fee trap. To optimize returns or control risks, you’ll frequently perform operations—adding collateral, withdrawing interest, re-investing... Although on low-fee chains like BSC, a single Gas fee is cheap, the cumulative cost of operations adds up to real money. Especially for small fund users, these fees can eat up most of the profits. Sometimes, doing nothing and holding back is actually a smarter choice.
More importantly, systemic risks should be watched out for. Collateral in lending protocols is mostly mainstream tokens, whose prices tend to move in sync with the overall crypto market. In extreme market conditions, your collateral can shrink in value, and other DeFi protocols relying on these collaterals might also face issues. In the worst case, even the stablecoins you use for mining could be at risk. This isn’t just a problem with one protocol; it’s a common flaw in the entire DeFi Jenga tower.
Don’t forget governance risks. Although these protocols carry the DAO label, early on, actual decision-making power often still resides with the development team. A radical governance vote—like sharply increasing borrowing rates—can instantly invalidate your entire strategy. Such incidents have happened in DeFi before.
Ultimately, these protocols are powerful tools. To master them, you need a risk management mindset, not just a speculative one.