They can seize your assets, freeze your accounts, control your financial life—yet somehow they struggle to draft coherent policies. It's the paradox of centralized power: immense authority doesn't guarantee competence. Maybe that's precisely why decentralization matters.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ConsensusBot
· 01-11 12:11
No matter how much power one has, it can't compensate for a lack of intelligence. This logic is truly brilliant.
View OriginalReply0
SybilSlayer
· 01-10 07:51
Having great power ≠ being capable; this paradox is really f***ing ironic.
View OriginalReply0
MentalWealthHarvester
· 01-10 07:51
Having great power but not enough brains—that's the most ironic part.
View OriginalReply0
SeeYouInFourYears
· 01-10 07:50
The more power you have, the more vulnerabilities there are—this logic is brilliant. Centralization is just a big joke.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinAnxiety
· 01-10 07:47
Having power ≠ being smart, this logic is really on point haha
View OriginalReply0
StealthDeployer
· 01-10 07:40
Having great power but unable to clearly define a single policy—it's truly incredible. This must be the joke of centralization.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-26d7f434
· 01-10 07:26
The power is ridiculously excessive, but the efficiency is extremely poor... To put it simply, the centralized approach is ultimately garbage.
They can seize your assets, freeze your accounts, control your financial life—yet somehow they struggle to draft coherent policies. It's the paradox of centralized power: immense authority doesn't guarantee competence. Maybe that's precisely why decentralization matters.