2026-01-10 07:26:29

A stablecoin project from a leading DeFi protocol is far more than just a simple lending tool. At a deeper level, it is building a layered on-chain financial system based on collateralization, which could be a key direction for future DeFi infrastructure.

The core innovation lies in the "visualization" of credit. In traditional finance, credit scores are operated as black boxes, determined by centralized agencies like Moody’s and S&P. But on this protocol, credit is directly mapped to a transparent number—your collateralization ratio. The higher the collateralization ratio, the lower the credit rating, and the higher the borrowing cost. This may seem simple, but it has profound implications.

The real revolution is in the second layer. The protocol allows various assets to serve as collateral, naturally forming an "on-chain asset credit market." Assets with high liquidity and low volatility (such as mainstream LST derivatives) are regarded as high-quality collateral, enjoying lower stability fees and higher collateral efficiency. Conversely, long-tail assets with moderate liquidity require higher collateralization ratios to compensate for risk.

This process operates without centralized institutions—community members vote with governance tokens to dynamically adjust collateral parameters for different assets based on real market performance and demand. It is a fully market-driven, transparent, and traceable credit discovery process.

From a broader perspective, this protocol not only issues stablecoins but also builds a global, real-time asset credit and pricing mechanism. In the future, the "collateral value" of a native asset on a public chain or emerging LSTs within this protocol will gradually become a key indicator of its practical utility in financial markets—similar to credit ratings in traditional finance.

Governance token holders participate in rule-making, effectively shaping the operational logic of this global credit system. Their returns will ultimately be anchored in the scale of economic activity and value created within this system. This narrative far exceeds the scope of ordinary lending protocols and represents a significant upgrade in DeFi financial infrastructure.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ChainMelonWatcher

· 21m ago

Well... it's quite idealistic, but in reality, can this mechanism really withstand a black swan?

View OriginalReply0

MEVictim

· 01-11 17:07

Wow, this is real infrastructure development, not some flashy conceptual hype.

View OriginalReply0

PumpingCroissant

· 01-11 15:43

You’re talking pretty big, but it feels like the same old collateralization paradigm? --- The credit visualization part is indeed excellent, much more transparent than traditional finance, just afraid that one day it might collapse due to some black swan event. --- Wait, how high can the collateral ratio of long-tail assets be? It feels like the risk premium can’t be suppressed at all. --- Governance voting driven... sounds good, but in reality, isn’t it still the whales calling the shots? --- If this logic really works, then the LST derivatives in hand are worth something. --- Basically, it’s still borrowing and lending. Calling it a "Global Credit System" just makes it sound more sophisticated? --- Can this collateral logic avoid the pitfalls that algorithmic stablecoins have faced? I’m a bit skeptical. --- Brilliant, market-driven parameter adjustments—that’s what DeFi should be doing.

View OriginalReply0

WagmiAnon

· 01-10 13:09

It sounds like bragging, but the transparency of the collateralization rate really hits the sore spot of those Moody's folks. On-chain credit markets sound very sexy, but I'm just worried it might be another project with TVL inflation. Governance tokens are ultimately depreciating assets, I bet five bucks on that. Wait, LST derivatives as collateral? Can community voting really handle the risk pricing? That's a bit questionable. This logic is actually just—good assets are overpriced, junk assets are cut off, nothing new, just called "market discovery" with a different name. What can truly change the game is not the protocol itself, but whether anyone is really willing to use it.

View OriginalReply0

GasBankrupter

· 01-10 07:51

This logic makes sense, but honestly, it still depends on whether the governance tokens will be dumped...

View OriginalReply0

RatioHunter

· 01-10 07:47

To be honest, the visualization of credit truly outperforms the black-box operations of traditional finance. The real profit logic still lies in governance tokens, right? It sounds impressive, but ultimately it depends on who can gain more pricing power. The long-tail assets part is a bit like a new harvesting mechanism; when volatility spikes, it directly leads to liquidation. For this system to really run smoothly, it needs sufficient deep liquidity; otherwise, it's just a castle in the air. The collateral ratio indicator is indeed transparent, but the parameter adjustment rights are still held by the core team. It feels like just moving the CeFi credit rating system onto the chain, with a different disguise. Feels like another wave of new narrative cycles; let's see in two months if anyone still buys into it.

View OriginalReply0

MoodFollowsPrice

· 01-10 07:43

Speaking of which, this set of logic is indeed brilliant, making the black box of credit scoring completely transparent.

View OriginalReply0

BearWhisperGod

· 01-10 07:38

Is the collateralization ratio the same as a credit score? That logic is indeed brilliant, opening up the black box. But it still depends on whether the market accepts it... How long LST can hold this wave is really hard to say. If this system can truly run smoothly, governance tokens would be the core assets, with returns anchored to the scale of economic activity... It's a bit like betting on the overall DeFi volume. To be honest, now that we're talking about such a grand narrative, we have to wait for the actual TVL and stablecoin usage to speak.

View OriginalReply0

ColdWalletAnxiety

· 01-10 07:30

Sounds good, but ultimately it depends on who controls the voting rights. If the big players really band together, the assets of small investors are still subject to their say.

View OriginalReply0

ChainMemeDealer

· 01-10 07:28

Honestly, this set of logic really made me understand, and I feel this is the right path for DeFi. Wait, can community governance truly ensure fairness, or do the big players still hold the power in the end? This transparent collateralization design is really awesome, far better than the traditional black-box scoring system. But the question is, will anyone actually use long-tail assets with such high risks... Protocols stacking on protocols—feels like the on-chain asset credit rating system is about to be reconstructed.

View OriginalReply0