Recently, many people have been complaining that DeFi is no longer profitable. Actually, the core issue isn't the market itself, but that everyone is clustering around doing the same thing. Liquidity mining, lending interest, perpetual fee rates—these outdated strategies are being squeezed out, and no one can make a profit.
This phenomenon makes me more optimistic about a type of active yield strategy. Take Walrus, for example; its approach is quite different. Instead of sticking to a few outdated pools waiting for returns, it lets the strategy library find opportunities based on real-time on-chain data and funding costs. When market conditions change rapidly, it adjusts quickly; when new opportunities emerge, it might have already targeted them; when a certain yield point gets overcrowded, it shifts to the next promising place.
What we hold isn't a static mining pool, but a continuously self-iterating mechanism that hunts for Alpha. In this unpredictable crypto market, such adaptability and flexibility are the true shields of protection.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MiningDisasterSurvivor
· 01-10 07:58
I've been through it all. That wave of Yield Farming in 2018 died just like that, and later there were all kinds of "active strategy" projects, most of which either ran away or had contract bugs. Walrus's "self-iterative hunting for Alpha" sounds just like those DAO projects from 2021—fancy words that are just another rebrand of a money game.
---
Honestly, I've heard too many times that "finding your own food based on on-chain data," but in the end, it's just project teams running away.
---
Another high-level Ponzi scheme with fancy packaging—what they call a "Protection Shield." When the bear market hits, everything turns to paper.
---
Wait, has the contract of this strategy library been audited, or is it just the same old self-audit routine?
---
The same old tricks, just changing the shell to fool a new batch of newbies. I'm really tired.
View OriginalReply0
TheMemefather
· 01-10 07:44
Mining has long become a red ocean. Instead of guarding those few broken pools, it's better to just go to sleep.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropBuffet
· 01-10 07:44
This is what I want to see. Stop clinging to those drained mining pools.
View OriginalReply0
WenAirdrop
· 01-10 07:39
Something doesn't feel right. Walrus's automatic search mechanism sounds good, but to be honest, I still have some doubts... What do we do if the algorithm goes off course?
Recently, many people have been complaining that DeFi is no longer profitable. Actually, the core issue isn't the market itself, but that everyone is clustering around doing the same thing. Liquidity mining, lending interest, perpetual fee rates—these outdated strategies are being squeezed out, and no one can make a profit.
This phenomenon makes me more optimistic about a type of active yield strategy. Take Walrus, for example; its approach is quite different. Instead of sticking to a few outdated pools waiting for returns, it lets the strategy library find opportunities based on real-time on-chain data and funding costs. When market conditions change rapidly, it adjusts quickly; when new opportunities emerge, it might have already targeted them; when a certain yield point gets overcrowded, it shifts to the next promising place.
What we hold isn't a static mining pool, but a continuously self-iterating mechanism that hunts for Alpha. In this unpredictable crypto market, such adaptability and flexibility are the true shields of protection.