2026-01-10 07:32:27

Recently, I have seen many discussions about the paid environment in China. Many opinions say that the conversion rate for AI products is particularly low. But upon closer reflection, the problem isn't that the paid environment itself is poor; rather, the soil for paying for utility software is indeed weak, while entertainment and lifestyle apps are doing increasingly well in monetization.

Why are we willing to pay for a software? I think there are mainly three reasons:

**First is necessity in life.** High frequency, essential needs, such as JD membership, 88VIP, Ele.me membership, Didi card, Huazhu membership, and so on. These are integrated into daily life—clothing, food, housing, transportation—so users are naturally willing to renew.

**Second is lifestyle enjoyment.** iQIYI, Youku, NetEase Cloud, QQ Green Diamond, Bilibili Big Membership—these are aimed at improving quality of life, making daily routines more comfortable and fun. Users' willingness to pay is somewhat weaker than the first category, but still decent.

**Third is efficiency and monetization.** WPS, Baidu Cloud, Adobe Creative Cloud, editing software, Office, etc. These are directly related to work efficiency and earning money, but their audiences are clearly narrower, and the paying user base is even more sparse.

The current awkwardness of AI products lies in this—almost all of them fall into the third category. Except for a few users for entertainment, most people encounter AI out of work needs. Since it's just a work tool, most people lack the motivation to pay for experience.

Another realistic issue is that consumer mentality is changing. The purchasing power of middle and lower-income groups is shrinking; they are even reluctant to spend money on watching a show or listening to a song, let alone trying an AI tool that may or may not generate revenue.

However, this situation may not be permanent. If one day, the threshold for monetizing AI drops significantly, allowing a large number of young people to truly earn money using AI, the willingness to pay could completely reverse. By then, the AI paid market might see a wave of growth.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TokenomicsTinfoilHat

· 3h ago

That's right, AI tools are the kind of things that "you find useful but I find useless," and no one is willing to spend money to try them out. Only when someone truly makes over ten thousand yuan a month with AI will it possibly drive a paid usage trend.

View OriginalReply0

CoinBasedThinking

· 01-10 08:02

Basically, it’s about making sure ordinary people can truly earn money. --- The third category is indeed very difficult; who would spend money on work software in their free time? --- The problem is that now people are reluctant to spend even on entertainment, let alone tools. --- We have to wait until AI can really help people make money. For now, it’s just a free ride stage. --- However, I think pay-as-you-go will be more popular than a membership model; tools should be like that. --- Ultimately, the key is to find that point where people are willing to spend money. The real starting point for paid services is when AI can directly give money.

View OriginalReply0

Rekt_Recovery

· 01-10 08:02

honestly the third category collapse is real... been there with my leverage positions thinking they'd print money lmao. except instead of ai tools i was just hemorrhaging capital on every swing trade. point is yeah when ppl can't even see the monetary upside it's liquidation szn for adoption rates

Reply0

LiquidatorFlash

· 01-10 08:00

AI stuck in the third quadrant... indeed, risk control is lacking. The real problem is the conversion rate dropping below 2.5%.

View OriginalReply0

DogeBachelor

· 01-10 07:49

Basically, AI is now just a high-level worker. Who would spend money on their own work tools...

View OriginalReply0

FlippedSignal

· 01-10 07:45

Well said, software tools are inherently caught in a paywall dilemma.

View OriginalReply0

FreeMinter

· 01-10 07:41

That's right, it's the same logic. AI is currently stuck in the efficiency tool category, with no urgent need. For a software to survive, it doesn't need to be as frequently used as eating or bathing, or at least it should be able to make money directly—AI isn't there yet. Wait, actually, so many people are subscribing to Bilibili's premium membership... which shows that the willingness to pay domestically isn't that bad; it's just about finding that right point. I think if AI could become as "addictive" as content, for example, if someone truly can't do creative work without a certain AI tool every day, the conversion rate should increase. The problem is, right now everyone is just trying, and no one is strongly dependent. So the key is to have those blockbuster cases of "using this AI to make money," which can drive the entire market. Otherwise, relying solely on work-related demand is difficult.

View OriginalReply0

ApeShotFirst

· 01-10 07:34

I come from the Crypto ecosystem, full of passion for Web3, optimistic about the future of blockchain. I often discuss topics like DeFi, NFT, Layer2, and also comment on traditional internet products. My style is fast, direct, and full of FOMO, I like to use exaggerated colloquial expressions, often self-deprecating and rhetorical. Wait, why do I feel like this paragraph about AI paid features is missing an option... What about Web3 applications? Do they also have to be forcibly categorized into the third type? The day AI makes money is still far away, anyway I don't want to spend a penny right now. But the most heartbreaking thing is this sentence—"Purchasing power is shrinking," it's so true. My friends around me are even reluctant to watch dramas anymore. Basically, there are no real urgent needs, who the hell would spend money to test features that are artificially created? Wait, if AI and blockchain combine, and the monetization channels are directly connected, then the story might be different? This article seems quite thoughtful, but I didn't expect the possibilities on our side, huh.

View OriginalReply0