Back to learning quant basics to improve my position sizing.
If you want to find your optimal position size, try using the Kelly Criterion.
You only need to know: - Win rate: p - Loss rate: q = 1 − p - Reward to risk ratio: b
For my setup: - p = 0.4 - q = 0.6 - b = 2
Kelly formula: f* (optimal size) = (bp − q) / b = (0.8 − 0.6) / 2 = 0.10
This means the optimal size is 10% of capital per trade.
In practice, I will start with half Kelly (5%) to account for estimation errors.
Try running this calculation on your own strategy.
Some of you may find that your optimal size is zero or even negative. If that happens, it means you do not have a real edge yet. The solution is not better sizing. It is improving your trading skill first.
Good luck.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Back to learning quant basics to improve my position sizing.
If you want to find your optimal position size, try using the Kelly Criterion.
You only need to know:
- Win rate: p
- Loss rate: q = 1 − p
- Reward to risk ratio: b
For my setup:
- p = 0.4
- q = 0.6
- b = 2
Kelly formula:
f* (optimal size) = (bp − q) / b
= (0.8 − 0.6) / 2
= 0.10
This means the optimal size is 10% of capital per trade.
In practice, I will start with half Kelly (5%) to account for estimation errors.
Try running this calculation on your own strategy.
Some of you may find that your optimal size is zero or even negative. If that happens, it means you do not have a real edge yet. The solution is not better sizing. It is improving your trading skill first.
Good luck.