2026-01-10 08:23:35

How do we actually measure if AGI or advanced humanoid robots have truly arrived? Here's a thought: they'd need to match what Cirque du Soleil performers pull off—or keep pace with Olympic athletes—all while working with comparable physical constraints and computational power. That's the bar worth setting. Can they move like that? Can they innovate within the same limitations? That's when we know we're looking at something genuinely intelligent.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

HodlKumamon

· 01-10 08:48

Xiongxiong thinks this standard is okay, but based on current computing power data, if we really want to compete with Olympic athletes, we might have to wait a bit longer...

View OriginalReply0

SerRugResistant

· 01-10 08:46

NGL, this standard is a bit strict, but I like this approach.

View OriginalReply0

Anon32942

· 01-10 08:45

Haha, the standards are a bit high, but I like it.

View OriginalReply0

SorryRugPulled

· 01-10 08:42

NGL, the standard set is a bit high, and the difficulty level of Cirque du Soleil is a bit outrageous compared to AGI... But on the other hand, human physical constraints are the real test, right?

View OriginalReply0