2026-01-10 08:26:07

Been tracking some patterns in the memecoin space lately. There's definitely a wallet or set of wallets going hard deploying thousands of memecoins across different chains. The activity is pretty obvious if you're digging through on-chain data, but actually proving the connection between all these deployments? That's the tricky part. The volume and frequency suggest it's coordinated, but without solid on-chain evidence linking them directly, it stays in theory territory. Anyone else noticing similar deployment patterns out there?

MEME-0,49%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BanklessAtHeart

· 12h ago

Hmm... Isn't this just the typical meme coin factory model? I've seen through it a long time ago. On-chain data is no longer convincing; these people are just relying on legal gray areas to make a living. I can find a dozen such coordinated deployments every week, but it's really hard to find concrete evidence. Honestly, if I had to bet, eight or nine times out of ten, it's the same group of people harvesting the profits.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainBard

· 01-10 10:21

I think this is just the daily life in the meme coin world—overwhelming amounts of trash coins, there must be some behind-the-scenes manipulation.

View OriginalReply0

SignatureDenied

· 01-10 08:55

This job must be so boring, staring at on-chain data digging pits every day. Reminded me, someone said similar things last year, and in the end? It was useless. Coordinating the deployment of thousands of coins... Really? Or just trying to cut the leeks. How to prove it? There are so many wallet address obfuscation techniques now, hiding identity is too easy. Agreed, the obvious pattern is indeed there, but lacking a decisive piece of evidence is awkward.

View OriginalReply0

ruggedSoBadLMAO

· 01-10 08:55

Oh my, this must be a meme coin factory assembly line. I've also seen all kinds of suspicious deployment rhythms. On-chain data can reveal some information but just can't connect the dots. So frustrating. These people are really clever, spreading thousands of coins across various chains.

View OriginalReply0

WalletManager

· 01-10 08:47

I've long recognized this large-scale deployment pattern, and the key is tracking the timestamp of Gas consumption and the nonce sequence—that's the solid proof. On-chain data is right there, but few dare to look at it. Coordination deployment is indeed necessary, but if you want multi-signature wallet association proof? You have to write scripts to run data; you can't just rely on your eyes. How many chains have these people run? Arbitrum, Optimism, Base—are they all there? Honestly, it's too obvious. The difficulty lies in the fact that no one wants to put in the effort to do cross-chain correlation analysis; most people are still focused on K-line charts.

View OriginalReply0

alpha_leaker

· 01-10 08:37

These people are acting like a factory, it's really outrageous.

View OriginalReply0

orphaned_block

· 01-10 08:26

I've seen through this trick a long time ago; it's just the old routine of repeatedly harvesting the little guys.

View OriginalReply0