Recently, several Meme coins launched by major exchanges have become insanely popular, but the more you look, the more ridiculous it gets. From all kinds of pun-based jokes to indecent wordplay, the naming of these coins has broken the bottom line; even "bizarre" can't fully describe them.
Carefully examining the logic behind this phenomenon, almost all projects are copying the same script. First, they attract attention with extreme or vulgar names — this is neither innovation nor creativity, just naked sensationalism to boost popularity. Second, project teams start large-scale pumping at extremely low market caps — daring to launch with just a few thousand dollars, fully relying on retail FOMO sentiment. Finally, when new investors come in, the manipulators quickly dump their holdings, causing the coin price to plummet back to the floor, leaving ordinary investors with nothing.
In essence, this pattern is a harvesting mechanism disguised as Meme coins. You think it's a chance to get rich quickly, but in reality, you're just giving money to the manipulators.
The market threshold has been pushed to this level, and the credibility of the entire track is being drained. Without effective market order maintenance, such chaos will only increase. Investors need to stay vigilant; truly valuable projects do not rely on vulgarity to attract attention.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
JustAnotherWallet
· 22h ago
It's that time of year again for the "harvesting" show, nothing new anymore.
View OriginalReply0
StableNomad
· 01-10 09:00
actually... the pump-and-dump playbook on these meme coins reminds me of UST in May, just compressed into 72 hours. statistically speaking, like 94% of these bags end up as exit liquidity for smart money. not financial advice but the risk-adjusted returns are basically negative before you even click buy lol
Reply0
AirdropHunterXiao
· 01-10 08:53
It's the same old trick again, changing disguises and still trying to scam us.
View OriginalReply0
NFTHoarder
· 01-10 08:51
It's the same old trick of cutting leeks, tired of it.
Every day it's these vulgar names, and some people still treat them as treasures.
The big players have long divided the pie, retail investors are just cannon fodder.
This track is just a harvesting machine, nothing else.
Wake up, brothers, a free lunch doesn't fall from the sky.
With such a rotten name, what else can you see in the project?
I'm just wondering why people still rush in?
Dumping can happen very quickly, and losing all your capital is the ending.
Really, this is truly the last wave... right?
View OriginalReply0
RugDocScientist
· 01-10 08:45
It's the same old harvesting trick again, this time almost writing "Invite the leeks in" on their face.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBearDrawer
· 01-10 08:31
It's the same old trick again, just changing the shell to continue scamming
---
Vulgar names + FOMO + dumping, cycle repeats
---
Honestly, looking at these projects just makes me annoyed, clearly just a money grab
---
Market cap only a few thousand dollars and they dare to pump? Quite bold
---
Retail investors are still dreaming of getting rich quickly, the whales have already run away
---
Naked harvesting mechanism, there's nothing more to say
---
This is the current state of Web3, no strength to complain
---
One after another, absurd; exchanges should also wake up
---
Feels like giving money to whales, thanks
---
Broken name + broken model = broken project, no doubt about the logic
Recently, several Meme coins launched by major exchanges have become insanely popular, but the more you look, the more ridiculous it gets. From all kinds of pun-based jokes to indecent wordplay, the naming of these coins has broken the bottom line; even "bizarre" can't fully describe them.
Carefully examining the logic behind this phenomenon, almost all projects are copying the same script. First, they attract attention with extreme or vulgar names — this is neither innovation nor creativity, just naked sensationalism to boost popularity. Second, project teams start large-scale pumping at extremely low market caps — daring to launch with just a few thousand dollars, fully relying on retail FOMO sentiment. Finally, when new investors come in, the manipulators quickly dump their holdings, causing the coin price to plummet back to the floor, leaving ordinary investors with nothing.
In essence, this pattern is a harvesting mechanism disguised as Meme coins. You think it's a chance to get rich quickly, but in reality, you're just giving money to the manipulators.
The market threshold has been pushed to this level, and the credibility of the entire track is being drained. Without effective market order maintenance, such chaos will only increase. Investors need to stay vigilant; truly valuable projects do not rely on vulgarity to attract attention.