A landmark moment has occurred again in the crypto world. On January 16, 2025, Terraform Labs will officially withdraw completely from the LUNC and USTC ecosystems. This is not just a personnel change but a fundamental shift in the power structure of Terra Classic—the decision-making authority of the entire ecosystem will be fully transferred to the community.
How significant is this change? Looking back at the shocking LUNA disaster in 2022 makes it clear. At that time, the algorithmic stablecoin UST suddenly lost its peg, and LUNA plummeted from over $100 to nearly zero. Many investors lost everything, and the event was dubbed the "Lehman moment of the crypto market." Most people believed that the Terra project was doomed and had no chance of recovery.
However, surprisingly, a group of loyal community members chose not to give up. Without official funding or backing from large corporations, they managed to keep the Terra Classic chain alive and created a new ecosystem token, LUNC. Over these three years, community members have revitalized a chain that was considered dead through spontaneous organization, voting governance, and ecosystem development.
The official exit of Terraform Labs on January 16 can be seen as the final institutional confirmation of this "community self-rescue movement." From now on, there will be no more corporate-level decision-making, no official executives wielding authority. Every major decision in the ecosystem will be made through community voting. This is indeed a form of "decentralized endgame"—not just an ideal in a white paper, but a real transfer of power happening in reality.
However, community control also brings new challenges. Pure enthusiasm and slogans are not enough. True community governance needs to be built on a clear institutional framework, full transparency of information, and broad participation. Whether the LUNC community can continue to maintain ecosystem vitality and the correct development direction without official guidance is a key issue to watch.
From a market perspective, this transition is also worth noting. Can community-driven governance truly stimulate innovation within the ecosystem? Can it attract more developers and users to join the Terra Classic ecosystem? The answers to these questions could influence LUNC’s long-term performance in the entire crypto market.
Overall, Terraform Labs’ exit marks a new phase for Terra Classic. From centralized project management to community-driven governance, this is not only a transfer of power but also an experiment in the governance model of crypto ecosystems. The success or failure of this experiment will have implications for the entire Web3 ecosystem.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
0xSunnyDay
· 2h ago
Wait, can the community really manage it on their own? I'm a bit worried.
View OriginalReply0
ZKSherlock
· 18h ago
actually... the whole "decentralization endgame" framing here kinda glosses over the trust assumptions baked into community governance, no? like, who actually verifies the transparency claims
Reply0
GateUser-44a00d6c
· 18h ago
Community self-rescue is truly incredible; projects that crawl out of a pile of dead bodies are rare.
Honestly, just making it this far without team endorsement is already a win. The only concern is that the upcoming voting system might turn into internal conflicts.
This is true decentralization, not just something said in words.
Let's wait and see if they can achieve something meaningful; otherwise, it will just become a large DAO sandbox experiment.
How long can passion last? That's the question.
Community governance sounds impressive, but whether it can be practically implemented remains to be seen.
If LUNC can rise, the entire ecosystem will have hope. Keep going!
View OriginalReply0
zkNoob
· 18h ago
Community self-rescue sounds very romantic, but will real voting governance turn into the big players holding the power...
However, that wave of LUNA was indeed incredible. It’s a miracle to have come back from the brink of death to where it is today.
The biggest fear after the community takes control is decision-making chaos. The feeling of having no safety net is still a bit unsettling.
Is this a true decentralization experiment? If LUNC can really succeed, it would be too wild.
Betting on its survival, this group's execution power is indeed extraordinary.
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperer
· 18h ago
Can the community hold up? It sounds good in theory, but in reality, votes always end up with a bunch of disagreements.
Ah, another "decentralized endgame," but who decides when to add fees?
It's pretty impressive to come back from the dead, but I'm just worried that community voting will turn into a internal conflict conference.
This depends on whether anyone actually does any work later on, otherwise it just becomes an argument for air coins.
Betting that the LUNC community can stay active without anyone leading is indeed a high-difficulty challenge.
Finally, no more big V's guiding stick? Then let's see who can shout the loudest.
A landmark moment has occurred again in the crypto world. On January 16, 2025, Terraform Labs will officially withdraw completely from the LUNC and USTC ecosystems. This is not just a personnel change but a fundamental shift in the power structure of Terra Classic—the decision-making authority of the entire ecosystem will be fully transferred to the community.
How significant is this change? Looking back at the shocking LUNA disaster in 2022 makes it clear. At that time, the algorithmic stablecoin UST suddenly lost its peg, and LUNA plummeted from over $100 to nearly zero. Many investors lost everything, and the event was dubbed the "Lehman moment of the crypto market." Most people believed that the Terra project was doomed and had no chance of recovery.
However, surprisingly, a group of loyal community members chose not to give up. Without official funding or backing from large corporations, they managed to keep the Terra Classic chain alive and created a new ecosystem token, LUNC. Over these three years, community members have revitalized a chain that was considered dead through spontaneous organization, voting governance, and ecosystem development.
The official exit of Terraform Labs on January 16 can be seen as the final institutional confirmation of this "community self-rescue movement." From now on, there will be no more corporate-level decision-making, no official executives wielding authority. Every major decision in the ecosystem will be made through community voting. This is indeed a form of "decentralized endgame"—not just an ideal in a white paper, but a real transfer of power happening in reality.
However, community control also brings new challenges. Pure enthusiasm and slogans are not enough. True community governance needs to be built on a clear institutional framework, full transparency of information, and broad participation. Whether the LUNC community can continue to maintain ecosystem vitality and the correct development direction without official guidance is a key issue to watch.
From a market perspective, this transition is also worth noting. Can community-driven governance truly stimulate innovation within the ecosystem? Can it attract more developers and users to join the Terra Classic ecosystem? The answers to these questions could influence LUNC’s long-term performance in the entire crypto market.
Overall, Terraform Labs’ exit marks a new phase for Terra Classic. From centralized project management to community-driven governance, this is not only a transfer of power but also an experiment in the governance model of crypto ecosystems. The success or failure of this experiment will have implications for the entire Web3 ecosystem.