Is the CT community self-destructing? Top KOLs and analysts engage in intense debate over high-frequency posting

【CryptoPush】Recently, a topic has sparked a lot of discussion in the crypto Twitter community (CT). A product manager on X platform and Solana advisor shared a viewpoint: since October last year, a narrative has been popular in CT — if you want account growth, you need to reply and interact wildly every day. But he doesn’t quite agree.

His core argument is this: frequent posting may seem active, but in reality, it constantly consumes your daily influence. Think about it — an average user only scrolls through 20 to 30 tweets a day, and X can’t possibly push all content from the same person to their followers. What’s the result? Many crypto users spend their valuable influence on low-value interactions like “gm,” and when they need to publish project announcements or other important content, the reach is pitifully small.

He even used a more direct statement: crypto Twitter is in a “self-destructive decline.” The problem isn’t the platform’s algorithm, but the community itself ruining its own ecosystem.

Once this viewpoint was shared, the community exploded. A crypto analyst and co-founder of a well-known institution, KALEO, directly responded, saying this guy hasn’t considered the issue from the perspective of user growth and long-term engagement. Such comments could actually weaken the vitality of the crypto ecosystem on X. KALEO even publicly demanded his resignation.

Currently, the related tweets have been deleted, but this controversy indeed reflects the CT community’s reflection on the health of its ecosystem — is it a strategy problem or a platform mechanism issue? Various opinions continue to clash.