We often talk about what Web3 has changed—some focus on the fluctuations of coin prices, others on trading NFT images—but the true revolution might be overlooked. Data ownership and reliability are the most easily forgotten yet most important aspects. Recently, a storage protocol project called Walrus has attracted considerable attention, not only because it secured $140 million in funding from top-tier institutions like a16z, but also because it demonstrated its value in a real-world incident.
**When applications die, where does the data go?**
In early 2026, the digital art platform Tusky announced its closure. In the traditional internet, users' works, collections, and historical data would essentially vanish. But Tusky is different—because its data layer is built on Walrus, users' assets can be fully migrated to other platforms and continue to be used. It may not sound particularly special, but this reflects a fundamental architectural difference: data and application front-end are completely separated, and ownership truly returns to the users.
This incident actually validates a core pain point—creators, artists, and even any DApp users need a permanent, reliable, censorship-resistant data layer that can be migrated at any time. This is not just a bonus; it is the last line of defense in digital life.
**The "storage backbone" of high-performance public chains**
Walrus also holds another strategic position—as the official storage solution for the Sui ecosystem. This high-performance public chain excels at handling high-concurrency scenarios, whether for AI inference or high-frequency DeFi transactions. But if all data is stored on-chain, efficiency would instantly collapse. Walrus’s existence precisely solves this contradiction: enabling applications to operate lightly while providing a place to store data.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SchrodingerWallet
· 01-11 03:50
Oh wow, this is what web3 is supposed to do. Previously, many people only knew how to speculate on coins, but Tusky directly hits the point.
The data is really back in our hands, and it feels different.
Walrus's set of tools indeed solves a big problem.
But on the other hand, how many people will actually use this? It still depends on the adoption rate.
Damn, $140 million, a16z is betting on it, it seems they really take this seriously.
What I care about is that in the future, even if the platform runs away, user data can still survive. This is exactly what the infrastructure should look like.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTears
· 01-11 03:48
Damn, Tusky's move is truly what Web3 is all about. The data is really unstoppable... Other platforms should learn from this now.
View OriginalReply0
DAOplomacy
· 01-11 03:38
ngl, the tusky thing is actually pretty compelling... like, data portability wasn't supposed to be the exciting part of web3 but here we are. sub-optimal incentive structures everywhere else made it revolutionary by default i guess.
Reply0
HashRateHermit
· 01-11 03:28
Well... the Tusky incident really woke a lot of people up; data really shouldn't be locked into a single platform.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoWageSlave
· 01-11 03:26
The Tusky incident indeed highlights the issue; owning your own data is truly the way to go.
We often talk about what Web3 has changed—some focus on the fluctuations of coin prices, others on trading NFT images—but the true revolution might be overlooked. Data ownership and reliability are the most easily forgotten yet most important aspects. Recently, a storage protocol project called Walrus has attracted considerable attention, not only because it secured $140 million in funding from top-tier institutions like a16z, but also because it demonstrated its value in a real-world incident.
**When applications die, where does the data go?**
In early 2026, the digital art platform Tusky announced its closure. In the traditional internet, users' works, collections, and historical data would essentially vanish. But Tusky is different—because its data layer is built on Walrus, users' assets can be fully migrated to other platforms and continue to be used. It may not sound particularly special, but this reflects a fundamental architectural difference: data and application front-end are completely separated, and ownership truly returns to the users.
This incident actually validates a core pain point—creators, artists, and even any DApp users need a permanent, reliable, censorship-resistant data layer that can be migrated at any time. This is not just a bonus; it is the last line of defense in digital life.
**The "storage backbone" of high-performance public chains**
Walrus also holds another strategic position—as the official storage solution for the Sui ecosystem. This high-performance public chain excels at handling high-concurrency scenarios, whether for AI inference or high-frequency DeFi transactions. But if all data is stored on-chain, efficiency would instantly collapse. Walrus’s existence precisely solves this contradiction: enabling applications to operate lightly while providing a place to store data.