There is a very practical entrepreneurial perspective worth pondering—choosing an industry is actually like selecting a card table.
It's not about how skilled you are at playing your cards, but rather which table you're sitting at.
**The ideal card table order looks like this:**
First choice: Plenty of money, but average judgment among players. Users are willing to spend, decisions are easily influenced by emotions and narratives, market potential is still significant, and competition hasn't yet become cutthroat. This is where cash flow is fastest.
Second choice: Plenty of money, top players gather. The ceiling is infinitely high, and long-term returns are attractive, but the requirements for your capabilities are extremely strict. Usually the domain of large companies; newcomers must have clear advantages or they won't survive.
Third choice: Less money, users are somewhat rational. The demand is real, competition isn't fierce, but the market size and average transaction value are inherently limited. The business can stay stable, but don’t expect explosive growth.
Last type: Little money, many experts gather. This is a typical red ocean—market size is small, profits are squeezed to the minimum, and all participants are veterans. This position is the most challenging; newcomers are often eliminated quickly due to experience and internal competition.
**But here’s a key detail:**
The card table is not fixed at all.
The same industry, different niche markets can have completely different levels of activity. The same direction, entering a few months apart, can make the difficulty skyrocket.
For example, in education, courses that teach how to export and make money tend to attract rational users, with many experts and fierce competition; but areas like personal growth and emotional relationships often involve high transaction values, emotionally driven users, and quick conversions.
Looking at the crypto market, the difference in entry timing is even more dramatic. A few months’ difference can mean the difference between a bull and a bear market, directly affecting fundraising difficulty, user activity, and even project survival.
**So the real question has never been:**
"Is this industry viable or not?"
But rather:
"Which card table are you actually sitting at?"
Considering current hot sectors—e-commerce, AI tools, AI animation, cryptocurrencies, cross-border payments, robotics—where are they sitting at right now? This is a question worth thinking about carefully.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityWizard
· 2h ago
The table talk is amazing. I'm now wondering which table crypto is at... Two months ago, I thought it was the first table, but now I feel like it's slipped down to the fourth table.
View OriginalReply0
GasGuzzler
· 10h ago
The table talk is amazing, but the current problem is that most people can't even see which table they're sitting at... Especially in crypto, during a bear market, they still think they're experts, only to be completely harvested.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLord
· 16h ago
The poker table discussion is truly amazing. Crypto right now is a classic case of "a one-month difference in entry time makes a world of difference." The experience we had after all-in a few months ago is completely different from those who just joined recently. That's why timing is really more important than technology.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiVeteran
· 01-11 03:51
Wow, this card table is really amazing. No wonder I was stuck in the DeFi pit for so long early on; turns out I was sitting at the wrong table.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainArchaeologist
· 01-11 03:51
The discussion about the poker table was excellent, but ultimately it's all about timing and luck. Looking at crypto, a matter of months can determine life or death. Currently, those lagging behind are mostly just bleeding on blood滴子.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMuskRat
· 01-11 03:49
Wow, that analogy is perfect. I just realized I've been messing around at that kind of poker table all along.
Timing in choosing crypto really can determine life or death. A few months' difference can make all the difference between bull and bear markets, and there's nothing you can do if you can't secure funding.
View OriginalReply0
ForumMiningMaster
· 01-11 03:27
The timing is really perfect. The track I entered a few months ago is now extremely popular...
View OriginalReply0
MetaMisery
· 01-11 03:25
Entering the market months apart can mean life or death, and I have a deep personal experience with this... It's similar to choosing a tech stack; picking the wrong one is really more important than the technology itself. To put it simply, it's a matter of gambling on luck.
View OriginalReply0
gm_or_ngmi
· 01-11 03:23
Wow, this poker table analogy is perfect. Crypto right now is all about betting on the right entry point... The fates of those who entered during the bear market and those who entered during the bull market are completely different.
There is a very practical entrepreneurial perspective worth pondering—choosing an industry is actually like selecting a card table.
It's not about how skilled you are at playing your cards, but rather which table you're sitting at.
**The ideal card table order looks like this:**
First choice: Plenty of money, but average judgment among players. Users are willing to spend, decisions are easily influenced by emotions and narratives, market potential is still significant, and competition hasn't yet become cutthroat. This is where cash flow is fastest.
Second choice: Plenty of money, top players gather. The ceiling is infinitely high, and long-term returns are attractive, but the requirements for your capabilities are extremely strict. Usually the domain of large companies; newcomers must have clear advantages or they won't survive.
Third choice: Less money, users are somewhat rational. The demand is real, competition isn't fierce, but the market size and average transaction value are inherently limited. The business can stay stable, but don’t expect explosive growth.
Last type: Little money, many experts gather. This is a typical red ocean—market size is small, profits are squeezed to the minimum, and all participants are veterans. This position is the most challenging; newcomers are often eliminated quickly due to experience and internal competition.
**But here’s a key detail:**
The card table is not fixed at all.
The same industry, different niche markets can have completely different levels of activity. The same direction, entering a few months apart, can make the difficulty skyrocket.
For example, in education, courses that teach how to export and make money tend to attract rational users, with many experts and fierce competition; but areas like personal growth and emotional relationships often involve high transaction values, emotionally driven users, and quick conversions.
Looking at the crypto market, the difference in entry timing is even more dramatic. A few months’ difference can mean the difference between a bull and a bear market, directly affecting fundraising difficulty, user activity, and even project survival.
**So the real question has never been:**
"Is this industry viable or not?"
But rather:
"Which card table are you actually sitting at?"
Considering current hot sectors—e-commerce, AI tools, AI animation, cryptocurrencies, cross-border payments, robotics—where are they sitting at right now? This is a question worth thinking about carefully.