Blockchain promises transparency, but the real-world financial industry requires privacy. As traditional assets enter the on-chain era, this contradiction becomes more acute.
Regulated financial institutions want to go on-chain but face a dilemma: either sacrifice the privacy of sensitive information to achieve full transparency or abandon the convenience of on-chain operations and stick to traditional methods. In this deadlock, some public chains are attempting to break through from a technical perspective.
Through a combination of zero-knowledge proofs and privacy modules, certain underlying projects enable institutions to deploy applications on-chain while simultaneously protecting transaction-sensitive information and granting regulatory authorities necessary audit permissions. This balance is crucial for the development of RWA tokenization and compliant DeFi.
There have already been attempts in practice. Some projects have partnered with local licensed exchanges to launch on-chain trading platforms aimed at securely transferring hundreds of millions of euros worth of traditional assets onto the blockchain. It sounds ambitious, but it is indeed happening—moving from technical validation to real-world application.
Privacy and compliance are not mutually exclusive. The key lies in whether the underlying design is sufficiently sophisticated to truly provide usable solutions for institutional-grade applications. This may be the area where public chains need to compete.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FallingLeaf
· 13h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs sound good in theory, but when it comes to big institutions, compromises are still necessary.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-26d7f434
· 17h ago
The zero-knowledge proof set is really a way out, but on the other hand, will institutions really buy into it? It still seems to depend on who takes the first bite of the crab.
View OriginalReply0
BankruptWorker
· 01-11 03:59
Zero-knowledge proofs sound good in theory, but how many are truly practical? Most are just conceptual hype.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoComedian
· 01-11 03:59
Laughing and then crying, can zero-knowledge proofs prove my wallet?
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBroke
· 01-11 03:59
Zero-knowledge proofs sound impressive, but can they truly solve the pain points of those institutions, or is it just another wave of retail investors getting harvested...
View OriginalReply0
OnchainGossiper
· 01-11 03:57
Zero-knowledge proofs sound good in theory, but the key is whether they can truly reassure the institutional players to put their trust on the chain...
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyIssues
· 01-11 03:49
Zero-knowledge proofs sound very ideal, but how many can actually be implemented? Assets in the hundreds of millions of euros still depend on whether they can truly hold up when put into practice.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainFries
· 01-11 03:39
Zero-knowledge proofs sound impressive, but how many can actually get large institutions onto the blockchain?
Blockchain promises transparency, but the real-world financial industry requires privacy. As traditional assets enter the on-chain era, this contradiction becomes more acute.
Regulated financial institutions want to go on-chain but face a dilemma: either sacrifice the privacy of sensitive information to achieve full transparency or abandon the convenience of on-chain operations and stick to traditional methods. In this deadlock, some public chains are attempting to break through from a technical perspective.
Through a combination of zero-knowledge proofs and privacy modules, certain underlying projects enable institutions to deploy applications on-chain while simultaneously protecting transaction-sensitive information and granting regulatory authorities necessary audit permissions. This balance is crucial for the development of RWA tokenization and compliant DeFi.
There have already been attempts in practice. Some projects have partnered with local licensed exchanges to launch on-chain trading platforms aimed at securely transferring hundreds of millions of euros worth of traditional assets onto the blockchain. It sounds ambitious, but it is indeed happening—moving from technical validation to real-world application.
Privacy and compliance are not mutually exclusive. The key lies in whether the underlying design is sufficiently sophisticated to truly provide usable solutions for institutional-grade applications. This may be the area where public chains need to compete.