Recently, while analyzing on-chain data for LUNC, I discovered an interesting phenomenon—each data update sparks heated discussions. By early 2026, the total amount of LUNC burned has reached 436.293 billion tokens, which is indeed a significant number. But here’s the question: does this number alone have much meaning?
First, let's clarify the basic logic of burning. In the crypto space, "burning" does not mean actually incinerating tokens; rather, it involves transferring tokens to a permanently inaccessible address, effectively removing them from circulation forever. This is a classic deflationary strategy—changing the economic model by reducing supply.
Since launching its burn program in May 2022, LUNC has burned 436.293 billion tokens, accounting for 6.32% of its original supply. Here’s a key point to understand: don’t be fooled by large numbers. Some projects burn over 1% of their supply in a single quarter. In absolute ranking, 6.32% isn’t at the top of the industry. But why do I think LUNC’s approach is more noteworthy? The answer lies in consistency. Four years of continuous effort, with a "slow and steady" burn process, demonstrates the project’s resilience—far more impressive than those "one-time burns" aimed at grabbing attention.
Want to verify if these burn figures are real? You can check the token balance and transaction history of the black hole address on a blockchain explorer. All burn records are traceable, which is a testament to blockchain transparency.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Recently, while analyzing on-chain data for LUNC, I discovered an interesting phenomenon—each data update sparks heated discussions. By early 2026, the total amount of LUNC burned has reached 436.293 billion tokens, which is indeed a significant number. But here’s the question: does this number alone have much meaning?
First, let's clarify the basic logic of burning. In the crypto space, "burning" does not mean actually incinerating tokens; rather, it involves transferring tokens to a permanently inaccessible address, effectively removing them from circulation forever. This is a classic deflationary strategy—changing the economic model by reducing supply.
Since launching its burn program in May 2022, LUNC has burned 436.293 billion tokens, accounting for 6.32% of its original supply. Here’s a key point to understand: don’t be fooled by large numbers. Some projects burn over 1% of their supply in a single quarter. In absolute ranking, 6.32% isn’t at the top of the industry. But why do I think LUNC’s approach is more noteworthy? The answer lies in consistency. Four years of continuous effort, with a "slow and steady" burn process, demonstrates the project’s resilience—far more impressive than those "one-time burns" aimed at grabbing attention.
Want to verify if these burn figures are real? You can check the token balance and transaction history of the black hole address on a blockchain explorer. All burn records are traceable, which is a testament to blockchain transparency.