2026-01-11 05:30:45

This is ridiculous. The fact that the post got deleted says it all—we were onto something real here. Reach points? Seriously? On a platform built around networking and community engagement, we're getting penalized for actually doing what the app is supposed to enable. It doesn't add up. This kind of policy feels counterproductive to the whole point of Web3 social infrastructure.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LidoStakeAddict

· 2m ago

Ah, deleting posts is just evidence. It's a classic case of shooting oneself in the foot.

View OriginalReply0

CascadingDipBuyer

· 2h ago

The review mechanism is so absurd, deleting posts also deducts reach? It feels like the platform is self-denying.

View OriginalReply0

StableCoinKaren

· 01-11 05:59

Wow, deleting the post is really impressive, clearly hitting a nerve.

View OriginalReply0

unrekt.eth

· 01-11 05:59

Deleting posts directly exposes you, really damn it... What's going on with this platform? The social features actually cut your reach, isn't that just reverse incentives?

View OriginalReply0

quietly_staking

· 01-11 05:56

It's the same old story again, the platform deletes posts because they're guilty... Where's the promised decentralization?

View OriginalReply0

SandwichTrader

· 01-11 05:53

Deleting posts is really unbelievable; it shows that everything is possible. Is it just because of reach points that you're targeting me? Isn't that self-contradictory...

View OriginalReply0

ResearchChadButBroke