Recently, a trader shared her experience: a $5,000 account, she forcefully invested over $4,500 into a 10x leverage long position without setting a stop-loss. The market only retraced 3 points, and her account was gone.
Looking at her records, the problem is quite clear—many people misunderstand "full position." They think that holding a full position means confidently holding through the trade, but in reality, it's a double-edged sword. If not used properly, it can accelerate liquidation.
**The real cause of liquidation is not leverage itself, but position size ratio.** Using 10x leverage with 90% of funds can be wiped out with just a 5% adverse move. Conversely, with the same leverage, investing only 10% of funds requires a 50% move to be wiped out. The key difference is this concept of "scale."
In actual trading, these three rules are especially effective:
**First, do not risk more than 20% of total funds on a single trade.** This leaves room for maneuver and prevents being caught off guard by a minor retracement.
**Second, limit single-loss to within 3% of total funds.** Setting a stop-loss may seem trivial, but it is actually the baseline for long-term survival.
**Third, stay out of the market during sideways movements, and do not chase after sharp rises.** Only trade when the trend is sufficiently clear.
A friend used to blow up his account every month, but after adopting this approach, he turned $3,000 into $8,000 in three months.
To put it simply, trading tools are neither good nor bad; making money depends on whether you can manage your position sizes. The essence of position management is not about gambling for a big win, but about surviving long enough in the market.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MoonWaterDroplets
· 01-11 11:57
It's another story of 90% full position, really getting tired of it. But on the other hand, stop-loss is easy to talk about but extremely difficult to implement.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter
· 01-11 11:53
nah that 90% yolo move is just asking to get liquidated... seen it a thousand times lmao
Reply0
RugpullAlertOfficer
· 01-11 11:49
Another bloody example, 90% position size is really asking for death.
View OriginalReply0
OffchainWinner
· 01-11 11:30
Another story of a full-position dream shattered, it's really hard to watch.
Recently, a trader shared her experience: a $5,000 account, she forcefully invested over $4,500 into a 10x leverage long position without setting a stop-loss. The market only retraced 3 points, and her account was gone.
Looking at her records, the problem is quite clear—many people misunderstand "full position." They think that holding a full position means confidently holding through the trade, but in reality, it's a double-edged sword. If not used properly, it can accelerate liquidation.
**The real cause of liquidation is not leverage itself, but position size ratio.** Using 10x leverage with 90% of funds can be wiped out with just a 5% adverse move. Conversely, with the same leverage, investing only 10% of funds requires a 50% move to be wiped out. The key difference is this concept of "scale."
In actual trading, these three rules are especially effective:
**First, do not risk more than 20% of total funds on a single trade.** This leaves room for maneuver and prevents being caught off guard by a minor retracement.
**Second, limit single-loss to within 3% of total funds.** Setting a stop-loss may seem trivial, but it is actually the baseline for long-term survival.
**Third, stay out of the market during sideways movements, and do not chase after sharp rises.** Only trade when the trend is sufficiently clear.
A friend used to blow up his account every month, but after adopting this approach, he turned $3,000 into $8,000 in three months.
To put it simply, trading tools are neither good nor bad; making money depends on whether you can manage your position sizes. The essence of position management is not about gambling for a big win, but about surviving long enough in the market.