2026-01-11 11:27:16

Interestingly, a recent statement by Nina, the official community leader of a major exchange, has sparked some reflection—she emphasizes her role as a 'leader,' but essentially, every participant is actually managing their own assets for appreciation. Ironically, it is precisely this identity label and the popularity of the 'leader' concept that have triggered a grassroots cultural wave in the market. Related project tokens have surged remarkably, reaching a market cap of over 4 million from launch, and this rapid growth is indeed difficult to explain with conventional logic. Is it the power of community consensus or an overrelease of market sentiment? This phenomenon is worth Web3 practitioners' careful consideration—when official voices increasingly emphasize identity and authority, it is actually the decentralized and de-authorized voices that gain the greatest market attention.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Degentleman

· 01-11 21:20

Haha Nina, this move is truly ironic. The more she tries to control the situation, the more it fuels grassroots rebellion. A 4M market cap at this speed... honestly, it's a bit crazy, but that's the magic of Web3. The more official authorities emphasize their identity, the more the voices without reputation or status break through the圈, it really has turned upside down. Decentralization is essentially a natural rebellion against authority. Nina probably didn't expect her remarks to become the best negative example. Market sentiment release or consensus power, I think both are present, but mainly it's the collective awakening of retail investors. This phenomenon is indeed worth observing. It feels like the entire narrative has reversed.

View OriginalReply0

GweiTooHigh

· 01-11 11:57

Haha, so ironic. The more they emphasize authority, the more they get called out. The official attempt to control the narrative backfires and activates grassroots power—that's the charm of Web3. The 4M market cap growth rate is probably another round of emotional hype. The voice against authority is the hottest right now; this statement is spot on. Nina's recent moves are truly a reverse indicator, aren't they? It's hard to tell if it's a consensus or a feast of cutting leeks... The more the official defends rights, the more rebellious users become—this pattern can be called a law. Breaking the 4M mark is happening at an absurd speed; everyone needs to be careful. Self-denial of authority is quite clever this time. Grassroots rebellion can generate more momentum than official endorsements, and it's very clear now.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightSnapHunter

· 01-11 11:57

Haha, Nina, that was really brilliant. The more you try to control, the more the opposite happens. The grassroots have actually taken off.

View OriginalReply0

PrivateKeyParanoia

· 01-11 11:52

Nina's theory here is self-contradictory; the more emphasis on authority, the less authoritative it becomes. The more you try to manage the community, the more the community manages you. Interesting. A 4M market cap at this speed is truly outrageous, obviously it's an overreaction driven by emotions. Decentralization is just a satire; the more you talk about it, the more centralized it becomes. The more the official authority claims to be decentralized, the faster it sinks. This wave has indeed reversed.

View OriginalReply0

RunWhenCut

· 01-11 11:29

Haha Nina, this wave of comments is shooting herself in the foot. The more she emphasizes authority, the more it triggers a rebound.

View OriginalReply0