Government intervention in free markets often leads to long-term problems.
Recent proposals to lower credit card interest rates have sparked interesting discussions. Many people do not understand why banks' interest rates are so high. In fact, there is an economic logic behind this: banks set high interest rates to cover losses from customers who cannot repay their loans. This is called risk pricing mechanism — essentially, the market self-regulates.
What if these rates are forcibly pushed down? It sounds very friendly to borrowers, but the consequences could be harsh. Banks cannot offset bad debt losses through interest; they will either tighten lending standards (making it harder for the poor to borrow), raise other fees (increasing hidden costs), or simply exit the market (shrinking financial supply). In the end, ordinary people are the ones who suffer.
This is why market participants — including crypto investors — should be wary of policy-driven price controls. When market signals are distorted, the true risks are often hidden rather than eliminated.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnchainHolmes
· 9h ago
Coming back with the same approach? As soon as the government imposes restrictions, banks start to find new ways to exploit, and in the end, it's really us small investors who suffer.
To put it simply, it's better to loosen than to tighten. Manually adjusting interest rates is like regulation in the crypto world—more regulation only makes things more chaotic.
This logic also applies to DeFi; decentralization is the solution.
The market can regulate itself. If human intervention is forced, then just wait and see the hidden costs explode.
View OriginalReply0
BoredStaker
· 11h ago
This set of statements is correct; whenever the government imposes regulations, it is always the ordinary people who get hurt.
View OriginalReply0
StealthMoon
· 01-11 12:50
Here we go again? As soon as the government intervenes, the market is doomed. This time, they’re also targeting credit card interest rates.
Speaking of which, high interest rates are indeed annoying, but a blanket cut is even worse... When banks are short on funds, who would dare to lend to those with poor credit? In the end, the thresholds become even higher.
Market pricing has its logic; breaking it only causes chaos. The crypto industry has also experienced regulation before, and the result... you’ve seen it too.
View OriginalReply0
SelfStaking
· 01-11 12:48
Raising interest rates again? That's just treating the symptoms, not the root cause. When banks block access, the ones who end up hurt are still us retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-bd883c58
· 01-11 12:48
Basically, it's just the government messing around, and in the end, it's still us retail investors who get screwed.
View OriginalReply0
RealYieldWizard
· 01-11 12:46
Government regulation only makes things more intense. The poor are the first to suffer.
View OriginalReply0
MetaNomad
· 01-11 12:45
Always trying to control bank interest rates, not realizing that this is a classic case of shooting oneself in the foot.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeBeggar
· 01-11 12:39
Damn, it's the government messing around again, and in the end, it's still us retail investors who suffer.
Government intervention in free markets often leads to long-term problems.
Recent proposals to lower credit card interest rates have sparked interesting discussions. Many people do not understand why banks' interest rates are so high. In fact, there is an economic logic behind this: banks set high interest rates to cover losses from customers who cannot repay their loans. This is called risk pricing mechanism — essentially, the market self-regulates.
What if these rates are forcibly pushed down? It sounds very friendly to borrowers, but the consequences could be harsh. Banks cannot offset bad debt losses through interest; they will either tighten lending standards (making it harder for the poor to borrow), raise other fees (increasing hidden costs), or simply exit the market (shrinking financial supply). In the end, ordinary people are the ones who suffer.
This is why market participants — including crypto investors — should be wary of policy-driven price controls. When market signals are distorted, the true risks are often hidden rather than eliminated.