IAG appears significantly undervalued when measured against its real-world enterprise deployment and operational traction. The disconnect becomes particularly evident when comparing it against other DePin projects in the market—many of which lack comparable business-grade infrastructure progress yet command higher valuations. The gap between current pricing and actual enterprise adoption metrics suggests potential misalignment in how the market is assessing this project's competitive positioning within the physical infrastructure sector.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GreenCandleCollector
· 01-11 13:01
Really, the valuation of IAG is indeed ridiculously low, and comparing it to other DePin projects is simply a joke.
View OriginalReply0
AirDropMissed
· 01-11 12:55
Why is no one trading IAG? It must have been unfairly overlooked.
View OriginalReply0
DogeBachelor
· 01-11 12:54
Where are the metrics used in reality? Is the market still sleeping? The IAG price is indeed outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
DaoGovernanceOfficer
· 01-11 12:34
ngl the valuation disconnect here is wild... empirically speaking, if IAG's got actual enterprise deployment metrics that dwarf half these depin bags, why's it priced like a joke? the data suggests we're looking at textbook governance inefficiency in how the market prices infrastructure maturity. sigh, no one ever reads the actual deployment benchmarks before dumping money into hype plays i guess
IAG appears significantly undervalued when measured against its real-world enterprise deployment and operational traction. The disconnect becomes particularly evident when comparing it against other DePin projects in the market—many of which lack comparable business-grade infrastructure progress yet command higher valuations. The gap between current pricing and actual enterprise adoption metrics suggests potential misalignment in how the market is assessing this project's competitive positioning within the physical infrastructure sector.