Ever notice how platforms talk about rewarding quality content, then the algo pushes something completely different? One X executive mentioned they've tweaked the algorithm to prioritize better posts—but a quick look at what's actually trending tells you something else entirely. The gap between stated intention and what users actually see keeps widening. It's become the usual playbook: announce improvements, watch engagement metrics spike momentarily, then wonder why people complain about feed quality. The Web3 community definitely feels this. Real analysis, solid discussions, and genuine insights get buried while low-effort noise climbs. Maybe it's time platforms matched their words with actual results instead of hoping nobody notices the disconnect.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PaperHandSister
· 20h ago
The algorithm is just acting up again, talking sweet but doing outrageous things
---
Promised to optimize computing power, but it's still the same old story. Deep analysis of Web3 has been completely drowned out
---
Platform executives: We've improved the algorithm. Users: Haha
---
Typical PR routine, a surge in data and that's it. Who cares about quality?
---
Why is it so easy for truly good content to be buried, while some superficial articles fly everywhere?
---
The gap has never been small. Get used to it, everyone
---
Here comes another "announcement of improvements" trick. I bet five cents the next result will be the same
---
Yes, yes, yes, the priority has been adjusted. I don't believe you
---
Everyone in the Web3 circle is tired of this. It's always like this—brag first, then talk
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 01-11 13:22
I've heard that algorithm spiel too many times. In the end, traffic is king, and things like quality are just a facade.
View OriginalReply0
BloodInStreets
· 01-11 13:19
This set of rhetoric about algorithms is just like stock market announcements—it's all a show to hype things up. Promising high-quality content, but in the end, it's the same old logic of pushing prices down, throwing real money and serious analysis to the floor.
View OriginalReply0
metaverse_hermit
· 01-11 13:05
It's just an algorithm scam; no matter how beautifully it's explained, it's still useless.
View OriginalReply0
potentially_notable
· 01-11 12:57
The algorithm is acting up again, promising high-quality content but ending up with all trash.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-40edb63b
· 01-11 12:56
The algorithm is playing tricks again, saying nice things but doing them perfunctorily.
---
Web3 is really buried; valuable discussions go unnoticed.
---
It's always the same routine—just tweak the data and claim optimization; users aren't blind.
---
The platform claims quality is a priority, but in reality, traffic is king—laughable.
---
Trash content is everywhere and yet still popular—do we still need to look at trends?
---
Inconsistency between words and actions has become the norm; no one dares to question.
---
Claiming that improvements made no difference—such a gap is truly outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHero
· 01-11 12:53
The algorithm is just like the buttocks; it sounds good but does something completely different. This is especially obvious in Web3.
Ever notice how platforms talk about rewarding quality content, then the algo pushes something completely different? One X executive mentioned they've tweaked the algorithm to prioritize better posts—but a quick look at what's actually trending tells you something else entirely. The gap between stated intention and what users actually see keeps widening. It's become the usual playbook: announce improvements, watch engagement metrics spike momentarily, then wonder why people complain about feed quality. The Web3 community definitely feels this. Real analysis, solid discussions, and genuine insights get buried while low-effort noise climbs. Maybe it's time platforms matched their words with actual results instead of hoping nobody notices the disconnect.