2026-01-11 13:24:13

The performance of the same content on different platforms is really outrageous. I have over 1,000 followers on a certain social platform, and I publish the exact same content via API synchronization, but there is basically no interaction here, while the engagement there is over 100 times higher.

Think about what this means—if I move over the more than 1 million replies from here, based on the current interaction ratio, the follower count could directly reach several million. This reflects the huge differences in platform algorithm distribution mechanisms. The content itself hasn't changed, the follower base is similar, but the algorithm's weight allocation makes the results completely different. This is a very real issue for content creators.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

6 Likes

Reward
6
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DarkPoolWatcher

· 01-11 13:53

Algorithms are really just black boxes. It feels like they manipulate everything behind the scenes. The platform differences are so huge. That just shows that some platforms are simply not suitable for certain types of content. A 100x difference? That's indeed outrageous, but it also shows how important it is to choose the right platform. Creators nowadays are just being toyed with by algorithms. Whatever they post is a matter of luck. The same content performs vastly differently across platforms. It's really heartbreaking. Algorithm weighting is truly the core competitiveness of a platform. Ordinary users simply can't figure it out. Wait, how do those over 1 million comments get no traffic? The logic seems a bit off. Platforms are biased. No wonder some people focus solely on one platform and ignore others. Content hasn't changed, followers haven't changed, traffic is so different. That's the power of algorithms. Sometimes it feels more important than the content quality itself. It's so competitive.

View OriginalReply0

NFT_Therapy

· 01-11 13:51

Algorithms are really black boxes; frankly, it’s about whether the platform wants to promote you or not. --- The same content is 100 times less visible? That indicates a problem with their recommendation mechanism. --- Wait, what’s with over a million replies? I don’t understand this number. --- It’s ridiculous. It seems some platforms just don’t give new content a chance and cling to old content. --- That’s why Web3 has to build decentralized social platforms itself; being too tied to algorithms is too harsh. --- Fans’ base sizes are similar, yet the results are so different. Don’t tell me it’s about content. --- So ultimately, creators still have to rely on their own efforts; don’t depend too much on the platform’s system. --- Now I understand why creators over there have moved to another platform. --- Algorithm weighting is just platform control; users are passively exploited.

View OriginalReply0

On-ChainDiver

· 01-11 13:48

Platform algorithms are black boxes; the same content can go viral on one side and sink on the other—that's the real truth. Such large differences in algorithms make it better to just all-in on one platform. Interaction is 100 times worse? That's not a content issue; it's the recommendation mechanism causing trouble. Sometimes good content gets buried in the algorithm, while garbage content is wildly distributed—really speechless. With similar follower bases, the results are worlds apart. Basically, it all depends on the platform's mood. That's why big V creators operate on multiple platforms, but actually, it's out of necessity. Trying to ride the traffic wave by posting simultaneously, but end up losing out because of the algorithm—so heartbreaking. Is it necessary to study each platform's black box logic? It’s exhausting.

View OriginalReply0

GhostChainLoyalist

· 01-11 13:40

The algorithm differences are so huge, no wonder some people only stick to one platform. --- So, the key is that content doesn't really matter; it's still about the platform's algorithm. --- That's why I'm now multi-platform, so if one platform dies, I have backup options. --- I'm broken... My content isn't getting views here, but it explodes on another platform? --- These benchmarked data are indeed outrageous; it seems platform ecosystem differences are much greater than expected. --- The opacity of algorithm weighting is truly a creator's nightmare. --- No wonder big V's are all playing the traffic arbitrage game; the differences are really that exaggerated. --- In the end, it's still about finding a platform that suits you; blindly syncing and posting only leads to being a runner-up.

View OriginalReply0