Fear Covering the Industry: What Is Quantum Computing and Is It Really Dangerous?
In recent years, one question has kept the crypto community awake at night: if quantum computers are developed, will Bitcoin be broken? Media headlines dance with apocalyptic images, but Michael Saylor—co-founder of MicroStrategy—has a completely different perspective. He not only dismisses this fear but also sees an entirely opposite picture.
Saylor asserts that instead of destroying, quantum technology will act as a “forge”—making Bitcoin stronger than ever. This is not an argument built on wishful hope but on a deep understanding of the network’s adaptive nature.
Why Are People Panicking?
The answer lies in the mechanism. Quantum computers, with their computational power, theoretically could break modern cryptographic algorithms much faster than classical computers—by millions of times. But this is “theory”—the key to the story.
In reality, Bitcoin is neither a contained system nor a protected museum. It is a living, flexible protocol, with a history demonstrating its ability to adapt. The community and developers will upgrade the defense system long before quantum computers become a real threat. Anticipating danger and proactively responding is not a weakness; it’s an extremely important advantage.
Michael Saylor’s Clear Adaptation Plan
According to Saylor, the process of protecting Bitcoin from quantum computers will occur through three specific steps:
Step 1: Protocol Upgrade
Bitcoin will undergo a coordinated upgrade, transitioning to quantum-resistant cryptography—algorithms specifically designed to withstand both classical and quantum attacks. This isn’t a revolutionary breakthrough; it’s similar to numerous upgrades Bitcoin has already undergone.
Step 2: Active User Asset Migration
Bitcoin holders will transfer funds from old wallets to new wallets, adhering to enhanced security systems. This process will be relatively smooth because users have a clear motivation: to protect their assets.
Step 3: “Freezing” Forgotten Supply
Bitcoin stored in inaccessible wallets—“coins that are truly lost”—estimated at millions of BTC—will be permanently “locked” from the market. They will never re-enter circulation.
Surprising Industry Outcomes
If you think this process is just a “blizzard,” think again. Saylor points out that it actually offers two major benefits for Bitcoin:
Enhanced Security: Quantum-resistant algorithms will elevate Bitcoin’s security to a level that even future technology will find difficult to breach.
Increased Scarcity: When millions of BTC are frozen, the circulating supply will permanently decrease. Less money on the market = reduced selling pressure = increased fundamental value. This is not abstract theory; it’s basic economics.
The security challenge posed by quantum computing will turn into an opportunity for Bitcoin to become more scarce and resilient. Such an occurrence is rare in traditional systems.
Broader Implication: The Power of Decentralization
Michael Saylor’s perspective outlines a fundamental principle: truly powerful systems are not “immutable” but adaptable. Bitcoin possesses two valuable assets: genuine decentralization and a talented development community.
This combination creates a “natural immunity” against technological changes, including quantum computing. Bitcoin’s true value doesn’t lie in its source code but in the social and economic consensus surrounding it—and this consensus has the capacity to guide technological evolution when necessary.
What Lies Ahead?
What is Bitcoin’s adaptation roadmap against quantum computers? It’s a journey from fear to confidence, from “will we survive?” to “we will rise higher.” It’s the story of a currency that can protect itself not through rigidity but through flexibility.
Ultimately, this journey will shape Bitcoin into a system that is not only more secure cryptographically but also more scarce economically. These are the perfect conditions for this “digital gold” to endure long-term and demonstrate its true value.
Some frequently asked questions about this topic:
Newcomers may wonder: Is current Bitcoin vulnerable? The answer is no—today’s quantum computers are not yet capable of infiltrating the system. The issue is preparing for next week when they become more powerful.
How does quantum-resistant cryptography work? It involves algorithms specifically designed to defend against both classical and quantum technologies—a pre-prepared Plan B.
Does upgrading Bitcoin require a hard fork? Likely yes, and it will be a broad coordination reform, similar to previous upgrades but on a larger scale.
How many Bitcoins are considered “permanently lost”? Estimates vary, but experts believe millions of BTC are in inaccessible wallets. In Saylor’s scenario, they will be locked forever, reducing circulating supply.
Do other cryptocurrencies face similar risks? Yes, all altcoins using similar cryptography are theoretically at risk, but Bitcoin’s adaptation plan could serve as a roadmap for the entire industry.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
From Threat to Opportunity: Why Bitcoin Will "Take Flight" When Facing Quantum Computers
Fear Covering the Industry: What Is Quantum Computing and Is It Really Dangerous?
In recent years, one question has kept the crypto community awake at night: if quantum computers are developed, will Bitcoin be broken? Media headlines dance with apocalyptic images, but Michael Saylor—co-founder of MicroStrategy—has a completely different perspective. He not only dismisses this fear but also sees an entirely opposite picture.
Saylor asserts that instead of destroying, quantum technology will act as a “forge”—making Bitcoin stronger than ever. This is not an argument built on wishful hope but on a deep understanding of the network’s adaptive nature.
Why Are People Panicking?
The answer lies in the mechanism. Quantum computers, with their computational power, theoretically could break modern cryptographic algorithms much faster than classical computers—by millions of times. But this is “theory”—the key to the story.
In reality, Bitcoin is neither a contained system nor a protected museum. It is a living, flexible protocol, with a history demonstrating its ability to adapt. The community and developers will upgrade the defense system long before quantum computers become a real threat. Anticipating danger and proactively responding is not a weakness; it’s an extremely important advantage.
Michael Saylor’s Clear Adaptation Plan
According to Saylor, the process of protecting Bitcoin from quantum computers will occur through three specific steps:
Step 1: Protocol Upgrade
Bitcoin will undergo a coordinated upgrade, transitioning to quantum-resistant cryptography—algorithms specifically designed to withstand both classical and quantum attacks. This isn’t a revolutionary breakthrough; it’s similar to numerous upgrades Bitcoin has already undergone.
Step 2: Active User Asset Migration
Bitcoin holders will transfer funds from old wallets to new wallets, adhering to enhanced security systems. This process will be relatively smooth because users have a clear motivation: to protect their assets.
Step 3: “Freezing” Forgotten Supply
Bitcoin stored in inaccessible wallets—“coins that are truly lost”—estimated at millions of BTC—will be permanently “locked” from the market. They will never re-enter circulation.
Surprising Industry Outcomes
If you think this process is just a “blizzard,” think again. Saylor points out that it actually offers two major benefits for Bitcoin:
Enhanced Security: Quantum-resistant algorithms will elevate Bitcoin’s security to a level that even future technology will find difficult to breach.
Increased Scarcity: When millions of BTC are frozen, the circulating supply will permanently decrease. Less money on the market = reduced selling pressure = increased fundamental value. This is not abstract theory; it’s basic economics.
The security challenge posed by quantum computing will turn into an opportunity for Bitcoin to become more scarce and resilient. Such an occurrence is rare in traditional systems.
Broader Implication: The Power of Decentralization
Michael Saylor’s perspective outlines a fundamental principle: truly powerful systems are not “immutable” but adaptable. Bitcoin possesses two valuable assets: genuine decentralization and a talented development community.
This combination creates a “natural immunity” against technological changes, including quantum computing. Bitcoin’s true value doesn’t lie in its source code but in the social and economic consensus surrounding it—and this consensus has the capacity to guide technological evolution when necessary.
What Lies Ahead?
What is Bitcoin’s adaptation roadmap against quantum computers? It’s a journey from fear to confidence, from “will we survive?” to “we will rise higher.” It’s the story of a currency that can protect itself not through rigidity but through flexibility.
Ultimately, this journey will shape Bitcoin into a system that is not only more secure cryptographically but also more scarce economically. These are the perfect conditions for this “digital gold” to endure long-term and demonstrate its true value.
Some frequently asked questions about this topic:
Newcomers may wonder: Is current Bitcoin vulnerable? The answer is no—today’s quantum computers are not yet capable of infiltrating the system. The issue is preparing for next week when they become more powerful.
How does quantum-resistant cryptography work? It involves algorithms specifically designed to defend against both classical and quantum technologies—a pre-prepared Plan B.
Does upgrading Bitcoin require a hard fork? Likely yes, and it will be a broad coordination reform, similar to previous upgrades but on a larger scale.
How many Bitcoins are considered “permanently lost”? Estimates vary, but experts believe millions of BTC are in inaccessible wallets. In Saylor’s scenario, they will be locked forever, reducing circulating supply.
Do other cryptocurrencies face similar risks? Yes, all altcoins using similar cryptography are theoretically at risk, but Bitcoin’s adaptation plan could serve as a roadmap for the entire industry.