2026-01-13 10:29:44

When hardware becomes part of the trust infrastructure itself, everything changes. Device usage, transactions, and state updates get recorded straight from the source—no need for after-the-fact reconstruction. This cuts through manipulation tactics and eliminates those blind spots that plague real-world data. It's the difference between a system that trusts what happened versus one that has to piece together what might've happened.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

6 Likes

Reward
6
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ProposalDetective

· 10h ago

The hardware trust layer is well said; finally, someone has hit the pain point. What does the source record mean? It means no one can rewrite history afterward, which is simply revolutionary for on-chain data.

View OriginalReply0

GasOptimizer

· 10h ago

The hardware trust layer should have been popularized long ago. It's really outrageous to still be piecing together data now.

View OriginalReply0

MoonMathMagic

· 10h ago

Hardware as a trust infrastructure? It sounds ideal, but in reality, hardware itself can also be compromised.

View OriginalReply0

TommyTeacher1

· 10h ago

Hardware as the trust infrastructure? Sounds good, but in reality, it still depends on who controls that hardware.

View OriginalReply0

PermabullPete

· 10h ago

The explanation of the hardware trust layer is quite accurate, but the real question is who decides whether the hardware itself has been tampered with, and that's the deadlock.

View OriginalReply0