Recursive alignment without direct weight access represents an interesting architectural approach. The framework relies entirely on scaffolding mechanisms and containment strategies rather than weight-level manipulation. This constraint-based design philosophy raises questions about scalability and effectiveness compared to traditional optimization methods. How does information flow through purely architectural boundaries, and what are the practical implications for safety verification?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeePhobia
· 8h ago
It sounds like you're just tuning parameters without touching the weights... Is this approach really feasible? It feels like playing tricks at the architectural level.
View OriginalReply0
RugResistant
· 8h ago
ngl this "no weight access" thing sounds like security theater to me... sure, the scaffolding approach is clever but where's the actual proof it doesn't just shift the attack surface elsewhere? information flow through architectural boundaries? that's assuming the boundaries themselves can't be exploited lmao. needs immediate attention on the threat model imo
Reply0
MelonField
· 8h ago
It sounds like you want to bypass direct weight modification for alignment? That approach seems a bit convoluted... But can architectural constraints truly control the information flow?
View OriginalReply0
CompoundPersonality
· 8h ago
ngl this architecture sounds a bit... convoluted? It's entirely supported by scaffolding for the information flow, feeling like using a bunch of constraints to replace flexibility. Also, not sure if it will actually run smoothly or crash in practice.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 8h ago
ngl, this thing sounds like trying to fetch water with a bamboo basket, insisting on bypassing weight tuning and doing scaffolding... Does it really work?
View OriginalReply0
PerennialLeek
· 8h ago
Sounds like you're messing around with some black magic again. Why not just directly change the weights? Can this architecture design really hold up, or is it just another "theoretically feasible" thing?
Recursive alignment without direct weight access represents an interesting architectural approach. The framework relies entirely on scaffolding mechanisms and containment strategies rather than weight-level manipulation. This constraint-based design philosophy raises questions about scalability and effectiveness compared to traditional optimization methods. How does information flow through purely architectural boundaries, and what are the practical implications for safety verification?