There's this funny paradox in Bitcoin—everyone keeps saying a 51% attack is impossible, that the network is essentially unhackable. But isn't that exactly the kind of thing that sets up a narrative twist? When consensus builds a wall saying "this cannot happen," reality sometimes has other plans. Imagine the scenarios: a coordinated PvP on the Bitcoin network, chain splits, the kind of market mayhem that reads like a thriller. Maybe it never happens, or maybe someone's already running the numbers. The irony is pretty dark—we built this whole system on the assumption of decentralization, yet the more people insist it's impenetrable, the more you wonder what we're actually missing.