Did you know? The combined market capitalization of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Dogecoin, and the platform tokens of certain leading exchanges has exceeded 2.5 trillion USD. How exaggerated is this number? It surpasses the GDP of 90% of countries worldwide and far outstrips 99% of publicly listed companies.
But this is strange—how can something intangible and invisible be more "valuable" than physical assets like factories and land? Is this rational pricing, or a collective illusion?
Honestly, their sources of value are completely different.
**Bitcoin is like digital gold** — its creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, embedded scarcity directly into the code, with a fixed supply of only 21 million coins, which no central bank or politician can change. It’s precisely this absolute scarcity and pioneering decentralization that caused its value to rise from worthlessness to hundreds of thousands. From shells to gold to paper money, every monetary revolution in history has been a shift in consensus, and Bitcoin is the current bearer of that shift. But frankly, its practical utility is actually limited.
**Ethereum follows a completely different logic** — created by a 19-year-old genius, V神. If Bitcoin only introduced the concept of decentralization, Ethereum turned that idea into real infrastructure with "smart contracts." Its value lies in possibilities — applications built on it are virtually limitless.
**Dogecoin and platform tokens represent community consensus and ecosystem value** — the former relies on community enthusiasm and cultural identity, while the latter depends on the actual needs of exchange ecosystems.
Ultimately, value is what people are willing to believe in.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ser_aped.eth
· 11h ago
Consensus is really amazing; just a turn and it can be worth 2.5 trillion haha
Basically, it's a faith game—whoever believes wins
V神 at 19 really slapped everyone's face, alright I admit I was crushed
Physical assets? Those can't run away, but they’re not worth a few Satoshis either
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 11h ago
In plain terms, consensus is everything, and faith is the price.
View OriginalReply0
SelfSovereignSteve
· 11h ago
Basically, it's a confidence game—whoever runs first wins.
Did you know? The combined market capitalization of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Dogecoin, and the platform tokens of certain leading exchanges has exceeded 2.5 trillion USD. How exaggerated is this number? It surpasses the GDP of 90% of countries worldwide and far outstrips 99% of publicly listed companies.
But this is strange—how can something intangible and invisible be more "valuable" than physical assets like factories and land? Is this rational pricing, or a collective illusion?
Honestly, their sources of value are completely different.
**Bitcoin is like digital gold** — its creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, embedded scarcity directly into the code, with a fixed supply of only 21 million coins, which no central bank or politician can change. It’s precisely this absolute scarcity and pioneering decentralization that caused its value to rise from worthlessness to hundreds of thousands. From shells to gold to paper money, every monetary revolution in history has been a shift in consensus, and Bitcoin is the current bearer of that shift. But frankly, its practical utility is actually limited.
**Ethereum follows a completely different logic** — created by a 19-year-old genius, V神. If Bitcoin only introduced the concept of decentralization, Ethereum turned that idea into real infrastructure with "smart contracts." Its value lies in possibilities — applications built on it are virtually limitless.
**Dogecoin and platform tokens represent community consensus and ecosystem value** — the former relies on community enthusiasm and cultural identity, while the latter depends on the actual needs of exchange ecosystems.
Ultimately, value is what people are willing to believe in.