Hello everyone. I want to discuss a data-driven rather than blindly optimistic issue: why are more and more top institutions paying attention to Bitcoin's medium- and long-term trends?

This is not just a slogan or superstition, but a phenomenon resulting from the combined effects of supply, demand, and capital factors. Simply put: "Supply is tightening, institutions are continuously entering, and the entry barriers for capital are decreasing." What kind of impact will this combination have?

**Institutional Consensus on Target Prices**

Let's start with some authoritative voices. Standard Chartered Bank's recent research anchors Bitcoin's price at $150,000 by the end of 2026. Although this is a more conservative estimate compared to their previous more aggressive forecasts, it already reflects a cautious attitude from traditional investment banks.

Citi's analytical framework is even more interesting—they have established a layered forecast system: the baseline scenario projects $143,000, a bullish scenario could push it to $189,000, and in the most optimistic assumptions, there is even room for further growth.

Top research institutions like Bernstein are also resonating at the same frequency, believing that Bitcoin could reach the $150,000 level by 2026, and advising investors to watch for related opportunities during pullbacks.

These forecasts are not made on a whim but are derived from supply-demand models, ETF liquidity calculations, and macroeconomic frameworks. Compared to retail investors making judgments based on intuition, institutional target prices are like a data-supported "roadmap"—not necessarily 100% accurate, but at least the logic behind them is transparent.