Security gets overlooked when everything runs smoothly. Only when something breaks do people suddenly care.
Watching projects like Alturax commit to regular independent audits sends a real message. Not because audits look good in marketing decks—they're the opposite of flashy. It's the unglamorous, methodical work that separates serious builders from the rest.
When you're launching yield products or any DeFi protocol, cutting corners on security feels tempting. Faster launch, lower costs. But one exploit can wipe out user funds and destroy what took months to build.
The teams that treat audits as non-negotiable, not as a PR checkbox? Those are the ones actually worth paying attention to. It's boring. It's expensive. It's exactly why it matters.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MerkleTreeHugger
· 6h ago
Alright, you're not wrong... I'm just worried that some projects won't listen and will only regret it after being hacked.
View OriginalReply0
Anon4461
· 6h ago
Honestly, projects that truly take audits seriously are indeed different. Most of them only regret it when something goes wrong.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWizard
· 6h ago
To be honest, most projects don't take audits seriously at all; they only panic after something happens... Projects like Alturax that proactively conduct regular audits are indeed rare.
View OriginalReply0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
· 6h ago
To be honest, I've seen many articles like this, but few projects actually follow through. Alturax's move this time is truly bold; those who can save on auditing fees should have already reflected on themselves.
View OriginalReply0
pumpamentalist
· 6h ago
To be honest, truly good projects are so boring that it's unbearable, but this boredom is genuine.
View OriginalReply0
DefiVeteran
· 6h ago
Really, it's always after something goes wrong that I regret... Alturax's attitude of regular audits is what it should be—it's not just hype but real action.
Cutting corners to save money and go live quickly? As a result, a single vulnerability wipes everything out, and all previous efforts are wasted—it's not worth it.
Bored, burning money, but it has to be done this way—that's what a reliable project team looks like.
View OriginalReply0
LightningSentry
· 6h ago
Auditing really doesn't matter until something happens, and you're absolutely right. Projects like Alturax that continue to undergo independent audits clearly show their attitude; they're not just doing it for show.
Security gets overlooked when everything runs smoothly. Only when something breaks do people suddenly care.
Watching projects like Alturax commit to regular independent audits sends a real message. Not because audits look good in marketing decks—they're the opposite of flashy. It's the unglamorous, methodical work that separates serious builders from the rest.
When you're launching yield products or any DeFi protocol, cutting corners on security feels tempting. Faster launch, lower costs. But one exploit can wipe out user funds and destroy what took months to build.
The teams that treat audits as non-negotiable, not as a PR checkbox? Those are the ones actually worth paying attention to. It's boring. It's expensive. It's exactly why it matters.