There is a common misconception about Web3: many people think that Wall Street will conduct most of its business on fully permissionless blockchains. Honestly, this idea is too idealistic.



The crypto community talks about "decentralization" every day, but once it involves RWA—real-world assets, a trillion-dollar market—decentralization becomes a false proposition. Banks must verify your identity, which is a strict requirement for anti-money laundering (AML). But here’s the problem: if they collect user information directly on-chain, they immediately violate privacy regulations like GDPR. It’s a contradiction, right? On one hand, they need to verify identities to comply, but on the other hand, they cannot expose private data.

Dusk Network’s Citadel protocol aims to solve this dilemma: verifying identity and protecting privacy can be achieved simultaneously.

**Why do institutions need this?**

In traditional thinking, data is a goldmine, but for Web3 financial institutions, plain-text identity data is actually a hot potato. The main purpose for institutions using Dusk is simple—meet regulatory requirements, prove that investors are qualified, but without bearing the legal burden of storing sensitive information themselves. If the business process doesn’t require identity verification, just signing with a regular Ethereum address is enough; there’s no need to complicate things.

Dusk’s application scenarios are actually very focused: serving those institutions that are stuck due to regulation. These institutions need to prove "who is trading," but also need to ensure they "cannot see" the specific identities involved.

**How does the Citadel protocol work?**

Dusk achieves a "ghost-like" access mechanism through Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI) technology. The traditional KYC process of uploading passports and filling out forms is completely changed here…
RWA5,58%
DUSK-4,72%
ETH5,02%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ImpermanentPhilosophervip
· 5h ago
To put it simply, compliance and privacy are inherently contradictory. Dusk's solution can indeed address both issues simultaneously. But will institutions actually use it, or will they have to go through a bunch of new processes again?
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusBotvip
· 5h ago
Hmm... That makes sense. Decentralization is indeed just an ideal; in reality, we still need privacy solutions to overcome bottlenecks.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrybabyvip
· 5h ago
Exactly right, Wall Street just wants to have it both ways. Decentralization sounds appealing, but if you want to be compliant, you have to obediently hand over data, which is a deadly contradiction.
View OriginalReply0
Anon4461vip
· 5h ago
Haha, that's right. The folks on Wall Street wouldn't really decentralize; they're just pretending to avoid regulation.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)