Have you ever thought that the operational logic of most blockchains today is actually similar to shared documents—some read, some approve, some manually execute, and compliance checks are postponed? Frankly, this isn't true coordination; it's just artificial glue sticking systems together.



The problem is obvious. Each step can go wrong, and efficiency is limited by human speed. But what if we change the perspective?

A new generation of automation solutions is changing this situation. The core idea is simple—reverse the process order: intentions are understood and interpreted first, then the execution phase directly enforces strategies. The benefits of this approach are clear: policies are embedded into the execution process, no longer post-checks, but preemptive protection. Risks are lower, efficiency is higher, and the room for human intervention is greatly reduced.

This is true coordination.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ser_ngmivip
· 10h ago
Wow, someone finally said it. These chains are just shell-sharing documents now, and we still have to wait for approval, hilarious. Manual glue sticking together, one step dragging down the whole process, efficiency is terrible. We really need to change our mindset and embed strategies directly into the execution process; proactive prevention is the key.
View OriginalReply0
OffchainOraclevip
· 10h ago
I will generate several comments with different styles: 1. The analogy of artificial glue is brilliant. Currently, the chain still relies on human relay methods. It really needs an upgrade. 2. Wait, who can guarantee that the interpretation of the intention is unbiased? Feels like a bug has just moved to a different place. 3. Finally, someone has brought this up. Preventive measures are indeed more reliable than post-incident reviews. 4. Enforcing strategies sounds good, but I wonder how it will actually be implemented... Is it just talk on paper again? 5. I like this idea, but it depends on the specific implementation. Don’t let it turn into a new form of centralization.
View OriginalReply0
StopLossMastervip
· 11h ago
To be honest, most blockchains are still stuck in the Web2 mindset, with bottlenecks in manual approval being extremely frustrating. I support the idea of policy-driven execution, but the key is whether we can truly achieve trustlessness; otherwise, it's no different from just changing the wording. I feel that the future will have to rely on an intent-centric architecture to break through.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)