There's a concerning pattern emerging in the crypto space: when prominent figures launch their own tokens, where exactly does the profit incentive lie? Consider the case of politically-affiliated meme coins—if the founder stands to gain significantly from market volatility or geopolitical events, does that create a conflict of interest worth examining? The intersection of celebrity tokens and real-world influence raises important questions about market integrity and investor protection.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
There's a concerning pattern emerging in the crypto space: when prominent figures launch their own tokens, where exactly does the profit incentive lie? Consider the case of politically-affiliated meme coins—if the founder stands to gain significantly from market volatility or geopolitical events, does that create a conflict of interest worth examining? The intersection of celebrity tokens and real-world influence raises important questions about market integrity and investor protection.