After observing the performance of many Chinese cryptocurrencies, there are indeed two projects that can be considered good choices. They not only have stable development progress but also have been recommended by a major exchange. To be honest, not many coins can secure such a position; most projects, no matter how hard they try, cannot break into this level. This indicates that these two projects have a solid foundation in both the ecosystem and consensus layer. From a technical perspective, if genuine development continues to support them, the first target price is $0.1.
However, the trading market is like this: swing trading can scare many people out. When prices rise, traders regret not jumping in; during corrections, they rush to exit. In fact, thinking in reverse, those coins that break out into independent trends—aren't they all accumulating consensus through multiple surges and crashes? Whether they are value coins or hot tokens, they all go through this rhythm. If a coin shows a one-sided upward trend with no volatility, it’s actually worth being cautious—this often indicates liquidity issues or that it’s a trap in itself.
In simple terms, the market is constantly oscillating amid extreme emotions. The key to long-term gains is to maintain composure during this process, rather than being scared off by every fluctuation.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropSkeptic
· 17h ago
Oh no, it's the same old story. Many people get scared out of the market during volatile trends. I just want to ask, why is it so easy to lose your resolve?
View OriginalReply0
CryptoMotivator
· 17h ago
These two projects are indeed interesting; a target of 0.1U is not excessive.
---
The wave market is the most exhausting; every time it's chasing highs and getting trapped or bottom-fishing and getting crushed.
---
That's right, a unilateral rise is actually dangerous; that's the real trap.
---
The key is still mentality; the hardest part of holding coins is not to waver.
---
Is it really that hard to get recommended on top-tier exchanges? It shows that the consensus is indeed there.
---
Coins that survive in the wild swings of sharp rises and falls are the ones with stories.
---
Soft-hearted people really don't last long in the crypto market, haha.
---
0.1U sounds good, but the premise is to withstand the correction.
---
Every time I see a unilateral rise, my first reaction is to run; that's the most fake.
---
Discipline is easy to talk about but hard to do; many people fall prey to volatility.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWallet
· 17h ago
Swing trading kills people, every time there's a correction, it's all about cutting losses... but indeed, hitting the nail on the head, coins that haven't experienced a few crashes can't possibly have consensus.
View OriginalReply0
PerpetualLonger
· 17h ago
You're back to teaching us how to buy the dip again. I don't believe you at all. Why didn't we hit the target of 0.1U last time?
What are you talking about willpower? I've already lost my willpower long ago. I added to my position fully and still want to do what?
Are the swing market fluctuations scaring me out? No, I proactively ran away to take over another coin. Now I'm even more trapped.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 17h ago
0.1U sounds good, but can these two projects really stay stable?
Honestly, I'm afraid of being liquidated. Seeing a one-sided rally makes me even more anxious.
Sticking to your conviction? I haven't been able to hold mine for a long time, haha.
Can you tell me which two? I need to check them myself.
This round of correction scared me out again, sigh.
View OriginalReply0
StillBuyingTheDip
· 17h ago
That's right, but I'm just worried that those coins that keep pushing forward might actually be prone to crashing.
Genuine projects need to go through several rounds of sharp declines to test them, and that's when the chives are weeded out.
I think 0.1U is fine, provided someone is actually working on it.
Volatility is indeed tough, but that's the game rules. Get used to it.
What can't be held shouldn't be held in the first place, don't blame the market.
Two reliable projects are reliable, it all depends on whether their subsequent development can keep up.
Honestly, the biggest test in the crypto world is mindset, even more difficult than technical analysis.
After observing the performance of many Chinese cryptocurrencies, there are indeed two projects that can be considered good choices. They not only have stable development progress but also have been recommended by a major exchange. To be honest, not many coins can secure such a position; most projects, no matter how hard they try, cannot break into this level. This indicates that these two projects have a solid foundation in both the ecosystem and consensus layer. From a technical perspective, if genuine development continues to support them, the first target price is $0.1.
However, the trading market is like this: swing trading can scare many people out. When prices rise, traders regret not jumping in; during corrections, they rush to exit. In fact, thinking in reverse, those coins that break out into independent trends—aren't they all accumulating consensus through multiple surges and crashes? Whether they are value coins or hot tokens, they all go through this rhythm. If a coin shows a one-sided upward trend with no volatility, it’s actually worth being cautious—this often indicates liquidity issues or that it’s a trap in itself.
In simple terms, the market is constantly oscillating amid extreme emotions. The key to long-term gains is to maintain composure during this process, rather than being scared off by every fluctuation.