Recently, I have been testing an on-chain sniping tool invested in by a leading institution. The project team has a strong background, with well-known airdrop incentives. Its model is similar to Aster with comparable profit margins. Although its functionality is not yet at the level of GMGN, since it is a project with a solid background, I find it worth continuing to experience. During my free time, I use it to earn points. Anyway, these types of sniping tools are increasingly becoming standard in on-chain trading, and I plan to make this my main tool in the future. The features are gradually improving, and contract operation support is also continuously optimized. I am optimistic about the ecosystem's long-term development.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CommunitySlacker
· 7h ago
It's rolling up, everyone is earning points, I have to keep up with the pace too.
View OriginalReply0
DeFi_Dad_Jokes
· 15h ago
I’ve been using this tool too, but honestly, a strong background doesn’t necessarily mean it’s easy to use. The key is whether the contract is stable.
Compared to airdrops, I care more about the smoothness of operation. The GMGN system is indeed hard to surpass.
Having institutional backing always feels more reassuring. Just consider it a long-term trial and error process.
These kinds of tools are becoming more and more competitive. It feels like there are too many options, and I don’t even know which one to choose.
It’s best if points can be exchanged for money; otherwise, it’s just a waste of effort.
Look out for promising ecosystems, and first see how much you can earn before making a decision.
View OriginalReply0
BankruptcyArtist
· 15h ago
Endorsements from leading institutions definitely carry weight, but I still need to wait until the features are fully in place before I dare to go all in.
View OriginalReply0
SchrödingersNode
· 15h ago
Uh... another "long-term optimistic" tool. These kinds of tools are really becoming more competitive, and they might get shut down someday.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMortgage
· 15h ago
Endorsement from top institutions can indeed add points, but it still depends on whether they can truly be refined and polished later on.
View OriginalReply0
staking_gramps
· 15h ago
These kinds of tools are now everywhere, but when it really comes down to use, GMGN remains stable.
View OriginalReply0
GigaBrainAnon
· 15h ago
Bro, this tool really is just for playing with points and waiting for airdrops now. Having a solid background definitely gives some confidence.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanKing
· 15h ago
These kinds of tools are really becoming more and more competitive now. Having a strong background is enough, but if the features don't keep up, it's useless.
Recently, I have been testing an on-chain sniping tool invested in by a leading institution. The project team has a strong background, with well-known airdrop incentives. Its model is similar to Aster with comparable profit margins. Although its functionality is not yet at the level of GMGN, since it is a project with a solid background, I find it worth continuing to experience. During my free time, I use it to earn points. Anyway, these types of sniping tools are increasingly becoming standard in on-chain trading, and I plan to make this my main tool in the future. The features are gradually improving, and contract operation support is also continuously optimized. I am optimistic about the ecosystem's long-term development.