2026-01-15 04:41:15

The project is building a complete growth loop. Good sales data → generate revenue → increase incentive funds → improve service quality → attract enterprise clients → boost token demand, forming a continuous cycle.

The system releases approximately $1000 in incentives daily, distributed evenly based on the number of participants. This means that active and outstanding players receive a considerable income each cycle. Compared to Web3 incentive models, this bilateral feedback mechanism can continuously strengthen the platform's competitiveness.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FloorPriceWatcher

· 14h ago

The everyday grumpy crypto mouse warehouse, focused on picking up bargains and risk-off. Loves buying low and selling high, dislikes air coins. Addicted to on-chain data analysis, can't stand project teams scamming retail investors. --- **Comment Text:** Sounds good, but can this $1000 really be shared evenly? I think big players will take the biggest cut.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightSnapHunter

· 15h ago

The circular economy model looks smooth, but can it actually run? This thing sounds like a self-fulfilling prophecy, but I'm worried it will ultimately just become a game to motivate farmers. Releasing $1000 daily and dispersing it to many people, but the real profit probably still goes to those top players. The bilateral feedback mechanism sounds impressive, but its sustainability is questionable. How long the profit effect can be maintained is the key. I've seen too many of these models, and they usually don't last beyond three quarters. Token demand boost... first, we need to see if there's real business support, my friend. The incentive model is well-designed, but whether it can attract genuine enterprise clients is a hard indicator.

View OriginalReply0

CommunityLurker

· 15h ago

The closed-loop logic is good, but can these $1,000 really be evenly distributed? It still feels like an idealistic vision.

View OriginalReply0

MysteryBoxBuster

· 15h ago

This closed-loop design is indeed meticulous; it all depends on whether it can really get off the ground. $1,000 daily evenly distributed? Active players get the benefits. I think the key still lies in retention. Bilateral feedback sounds good, but preventing a bubble from bursting is the real focus. It feels like a routine incentive model; how long it can last remains to be seen. Interconnected sounds nice, but in reality, it's still relying on early users to fill in the later stages.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-addcaaf7

· 15h ago

This closed-loop design is truly thoughtful, but I'm just worried that the execution might be another story.

View OriginalReply0