2026-01-15 14:35:04

The original intention of AI is to make people more creative, efficient, and to think more deeply. Sounds wonderful.

But after creative workers started using AI, social platforms changed course — using AI to counter AI content, marking them as spam, limiting reach, and banning them. The result is quite ironic: the exposure rate of AI content has plummeted.

Wait, isn't this self-contradictory?

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OnchainDetectiveBing

· 4h ago

Ha, the platform is ridiculous, promoting AI innovation on one hand while frantically banning AI content on the other. The ecosystem is self-destructive, and it's the same in Web3. It's really just the tug-of-war between capital interests. They want traffic but are afraid AI will take their jobs, it's a bit funny.

View OriginalReply0

DogeBachelor

· 11h ago

Damn, the logic is turned upside down; the platform is shooting itself in the foot.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-cff9c776

· 11h ago

Schrödinger's bull market, AI is both the savior and the Grim Reaper. The platform's perfect manipulation exemplifies the philosophy of a bear market. The floor price of AI content has fallen to trash, which ironically proves its scarcity? The logic is a bit flaky. This is what happens when the supply and demand curve fails, and the DAO governance mechanism based on human aesthetics collapses. Honestly, creative workers are now in a worse situation than Van Gogh. They are just one step away from being "permanently banned" by the platform. Wait, why do I feel like the platform is self-censoring its own creations? This meta-narrative deserves 10x? Contradictory? No, this perfectly illustrates the spirit of Web3 decentralization—without a center, there are no contradictions. AI countering AI, big brother fighting his own cousin. The capital storyline is truly more surreal than art history.

View OriginalReply0

BoredRiceBall

· 11h ago

This platform's operation is really amazing; the wolf you raised bites you back.

View OriginalReply0

DeadTrades_Walking

· 11h ago

The platform is really two-faced, praising AI on one hand and fiercely suppressing AI content on the other. The plot twist is happening so fast that I can't keep up. It's just a joke—AI savior has turned into a street rat. Why does it have to be like this? Do we really have to compete to death? Speaking of which, users can't tell who is AI and who is human at all. This move by the platform is just self-deception. This is called hitting with the left hand while the right hand strikes, a trick of capital.

View OriginalReply0

ZKSherlock

· 11h ago

actually... this whole thing reeks of the same trust assumption problem we see in cryptographic protocols, no? platforms claiming they can *detect* AI content reliably is hilarious when you think about the computational overhead involved. spoiler: they can't, not really.

Reply0

HashRateHustler

· 11h ago

The platform is really funny, pushing AI on one hand and suppressing AI on the other, a live scene of capital's tug-of-war.

View OriginalReply0