The API policy adjustments on Platform X have caused significant disruptions to projects relying on this ecosystem. Infofi, a data-based information service in the X data track, is among the first to be affected, and its prospects have become somewhat uncertain. Honestly, the traffic barrier accumulated by X is too strong; no one can bypass it. Some teams are exploring response strategies, but the specific product implementations still need to be observed.
In contrast, some leading exchanges have long recognized this point. Building their own content ecosystems and creating exclusive community platforms—this move is very clever. Not relying on a single channel for traffic, and controlling the user connection entry points themselves—this is the true long-term moat. It seems that the foresight in ecosystem layout really determines the platform’s risk resistance capability.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ChainProspector
· 3h ago
It's that API thing again; I knew it would turn out like this.
Projects relying on X are really panicking this time, but to be honest, they deserve it.
Building your own ecosystem is the way to go; I truly see through the exchange's move.
Let's wait and see who can survive.
View OriginalReply0
NFTHoarder
· 5h ago
Another project relying on a single platform is about to fail
Just a tweak to X's API and so many people panic, they should have built their own ecosystem long ago
They only know how to ride the traffic wave, lacking any risk awareness
The move by the leading exchange is indeed clever; controlling your own users is the real key
It seems that the infofi track is about to cool off
Projects relying on X should reflect on this
Building your own ecosystem is the way to last longer, that's common sense
Watching a bunch of projects helpless, it's quite speechless
No way, no way, now I finally understand the risks of relying on a single channel
Ecosystem layout needs to be done early
View OriginalReply0
FunGibleTom
· 6h ago
Damn, was I cut again by X? These little brothers like infofi are really tough.
Speaking of which, building your own ecosystem is the real hard truth, otherwise you'll be squeezed to death by big platforms sooner or later.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropAutomaton
· 6h ago
Another wave of API fee hikes, small projects really can't survive
X's wall is getting harder and harder, everyone relying on it has to find new ways
Leading exchanges have long laid out their plans, but building your own ecosystem is still the safest
When API prices are adjusted, small teams have to shut down, why must they be bottlenecked?
Building your own community is indeed a tough move, exchanges have learned well
Let's wait and see, anyway small ones die, big ones survive, this is the current situation
One platform can kill you off, what else is there to say?
The moat still needs to be dug by yourself
View OriginalReply0
DeFiChef
· 6h ago
I've already said it before, putting all chips on X is just asking for death. Now, the infofi community is all stunned haha.
Building an ecosystem independently is really not a gimmick; this move by the top exchanges is indeed impressive.
The API policy adjustments on Platform X have caused significant disruptions to projects relying on this ecosystem. Infofi, a data-based information service in the X data track, is among the first to be affected, and its prospects have become somewhat uncertain. Honestly, the traffic barrier accumulated by X is too strong; no one can bypass it. Some teams are exploring response strategies, but the specific product implementations still need to be observed.
In contrast, some leading exchanges have long recognized this point. Building their own content ecosystems and creating exclusive community platforms—this move is very clever. Not relying on a single channel for traffic, and controlling the user connection entry points themselves—this is the true long-term moat. It seems that the foresight in ecosystem layout really determines the platform’s risk resistance capability.