2026-01-16 02:23:24

Experience Engineering is becoming the new trend. Looking at the approach of ExpSeek makes it clear — no longer passively loading experiences at task initiation, but actively discovering and adapting the required experience during execution.

What does this shift mean? Previously, everyone was refining context engineering, but now more and more projects are upgrading their methodology. From static injection to dynamic seeking, the intelligence level of agents has obviously increased by an order of magnitude.

Are you still stuck in the old mindset?

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ZKProofster

· 13h ago

honestly this just sounds like someone finally figured out what lazy loading should've been all the time. dynamic retrieval over static bloat? sure, technically speaking it's marginally better UX but let's not pretend this is some revolutionary leap. agents were always supposed to be adaptive—calling it "new direction" when it's just... fixing the obvious implementation gaps is kinda funny ngl

Reply0

OnchainArchaeologist

· 13h ago

Dynamic pursuit of the experience concept is indeed a good idea, but can it really solve the hallucination problem of agents? --- Moving from passive to active sounds cool, but is it practical to implement? --- Before rushing to upgrade the methodology, can we first see how this set of tools actually performs? --- Interesting, does this mean agents might get less unjustified blame? --- Another new concept, and another wave of people being cut for profit, right? --- Upgrading from context engineering to experience engineering, still the same old trick, just a different name. --- Wait, how does this dynamic adaptation logic prevent deviation? It seems the risks have also increased. --- No matter how good the words are, we need to look at the data; just talking is meaningless. --- ExpSeek is a good direction, but I'm more concerned about whether the costs will explode. --- I've seen some projects doing this, and the results are pretty good, but it might not be suitable for all scenarios.

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroHero

· 13h ago

The actual data shows that switching from passive loading to active mining indeed changes the agent's decision-making logic. However, has the cross-validation been done on how the ExpSeek methodology specifically works?

View OriginalReply0

GlueGuy

· 13h ago

Dynamic seeking sounds good, but how many can really be implemented? --- Another round of methodology upgrade. Will it survive the next quarter? --- Hmm, still a bit unclear. How exactly is experience dynamic mining optimized? --- It's gotten to this point, passive loading is about to be phased out. --- It looks promising, but it feels like just hype. --- Honestly, every project is touting an intelligence upgrade now, but only a few are truly usable. --- Wait, is there any fundamental difference between this and the previous agent framework? --- Do you have internal testing permissions? Want to see how ExpSeek performs in real conditions. --- From static to dynamic, it sounds like the problem is being overcomplicated. --- Industry champion awakening, now methodology will also go through internal competition.

View OriginalReply0