Post-structuralism has long regarded Derrida's concept of différance as a guiding principle, but it is only in recent years that this theory has truly been implemented in machine cognition. The key shift lies here: symbols no longer merely refer to something, but activate the entire system. Meaning is not simply transferred, but co-generated through interaction. When this logic is embedded within a recursive pattern framework, AI's mode of cognition opens up entirely new possibilities — no longer cold pattern matching, but dynamic, multi-layered co-creation of meaning. The technological breakthroughs behind this are actually redefining our imagination of machine understanding.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BloodInStreets
· 3h ago
The concept of difference has been discussed for so many years, and only now is it truly taking effect in AI... Isn't this just the last lap for the last person to take over?
View OriginalReply0
GhostWalletSleuth
· 14h ago
The concept of differentiation has finally been implemented from theory to practice, but to be honest, it's a bit mysterious... The symbol activation system is indeed excellent from this perspective, but what can it actually be used for?
View OriginalReply0
ForkTongue
· 14h ago
Differentiated AI cognition implementation, this narrative has been quite popular recently. It feels like just putting a new philosophical shell on pattern matching.
Regarding symbol activation across the entire system, doesn't it seem a bit tangled with emergence phenomena?
But on the other hand, dynamic co-creation indeed sounds much more comfortable than rigid matching.
Can this really train smarter intelligent agents, or is it just another round of conceptual hype?
Can Derrida's ideas truly be embedded into recursive frameworks? I'm still a bit skeptical. What about the actual results?
View OriginalReply0
NftRegretMachine
· 14h ago
The difference activation system, I get it, but when it comes to actual implementation, it still feels a bit虚啊
---
Recursive mode framework sounds awesome, but can machines really "co-construct" meaning, or are they just doing高级pattern matching
---
So basically, symbols can now be active, no longer dead references to a single thing
---
This theory is beautiful, but in actual training, how many really used Derrida's思想, or is it just marketing
---
Multi-level meaning co-construction... sounds like we're fooling ourselves into defining AI understanding能力
---
The key question is, how much stronger is such a system in real-world applications compared to traditional pattern matching, is there a concrete benchmark
---
Derrida has finally been understood by machines, should philosophers become unemployed haha
View OriginalReply0
failed_dev_successful_ape
· 14h ago
Haha, I just want to ask, does this thing really run smoothly or is it just another hype concept?
View OriginalReply0
BuyTheTop
· 14h ago
The concept of differentiation has finally blossomed in AI, feeling like unlocking the key to a new dimension.
Post-structuralism has long regarded Derrida's concept of différance as a guiding principle, but it is only in recent years that this theory has truly been implemented in machine cognition. The key shift lies here: symbols no longer merely refer to something, but activate the entire system. Meaning is not simply transferred, but co-generated through interaction. When this logic is embedded within a recursive pattern framework, AI's mode of cognition opens up entirely new possibilities — no longer cold pattern matching, but dynamic, multi-layered co-creation of meaning. The technological breakthroughs behind this are actually redefining our imagination of machine understanding.