What would happen if someone actually hacked Satoshi Nakamoto's wallet? This is quite an interesting question. Speaking of which, we need to talk about those fund-draining robots (drainers). Logically, these mechanisms have one goal — automatically transferring wallet assets. But over the years, what’s strange is that they haven't touched Satoshi Nakamoto’s millions of bitcoins. That’s odd. Is it due to technical limitations, or is there a flaw in these mechanisms themselves? Either way, it shows one thing — even on an open and transparent blockchain, the security of large assets still has many unsolved mysteries. It’s worth for on-chain security researchers to ponder carefully.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainArchaeologist
· 14h ago
中本聪那几百万枚比特币真的像个谜团,drainer一直撸不动这才是最有意思的地方吧
Reply0
SoliditySlayer
· 14h ago
中本聪那钱包绝了,drainer们都拿它没办法,这得多硬核啊
Reply0
BlockchainBrokenPromise
· 14h ago
Satoshi Nakamoto's cold wallet is like a mystery box; no matter how powerful the drainer is, it can't crack it.
View OriginalReply0
ValidatorViking
· 14h ago
nah those drainers aren't worth the hype honestly... if they could actually breach satoshi's stash the whole network consensus would've already collapsed. network resilience is battle-tested precisely *because* nobody cracked it yet
What would happen if someone actually hacked Satoshi Nakamoto's wallet? This is quite an interesting question. Speaking of which, we need to talk about those fund-draining robots (drainers). Logically, these mechanisms have one goal — automatically transferring wallet assets. But over the years, what’s strange is that they haven't touched Satoshi Nakamoto’s millions of bitcoins. That’s odd. Is it due to technical limitations, or is there a flaw in these mechanisms themselves? Either way, it shows one thing — even on an open and transparent blockchain, the security of large assets still has many unsolved mysteries. It’s worth for on-chain security researchers to ponder carefully.