Sure, general-purpose coding assistants work fine for standard software projects. The real challenge? They fall short when you need autonomous agents that can act independently, learn from experience, and interact dynamically. That's a whole different ballgame requiring specialized design approaches.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FrogInTheWell
· 7h ago
NGL, the general approach really doesn't work. For autonomous agents, you need a dedicated design approach... otherwise, it's just pseudo-intelligence.
View OriginalReply0
ProveMyZK
· 7h ago
Haha, general AI writing business code is okay, but the real challenge lies in autonomous intelligent agents. Getting them to learn independently, make decisions on their own, and interact dynamically? That's the true test of system design.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBard
· 7h ago
General AI assistants are feasible, but true autonomous agents? That's the real test, and they need to be specially designed.
View OriginalReply0
FUDwatcher
· 7h ago
Well, this is the real test. General solutions can never address the underlying issues.
View OriginalReply0
TrustlessMaximalist
· 7h ago
Hmm, the general assistant is indeed quite basic. The real threshold lies in autonomous agents, and the entire community is still exploring it.
Sure, general-purpose coding assistants work fine for standard software projects. The real challenge? They fall short when you need autonomous agents that can act independently, learn from experience, and interact dynamically. That's a whole different ballgame requiring specialized design approaches.