How to evaluate crypto projects like a professional venture capitalist?
When you get a new project, many people don't know where to start. Actually, as long as you clarify a few key questions, you can tell whether the project is truly valuable.
First, clarify the basic information of the project and token—name, token symbol, current market cap, and how much you plan to invest. These data points may seem simple, but they can help you quickly assess risk benchmarks.
Next comes the hardcore analysis. First question: what real problem does this thing actually solve? Don't be fooled by the white paper; ask yourself whether anyone truly needs this technology. Second question: how is the code and product quality? Has it been audited, and is the development team reliable? Third question: what does the competitive landscape look like? What similar projects are already in the market, and how does ours differ? Fourth question: is the economic model sustainable? Is the token distribution reasonable, and will the incentive mechanisms lead to long-term inflation? Fifth question: is the community and governance sufficiently decentralized? Is the team's power concentrated, and do token holders have real influence?
Using this framework to evaluate projects can filter out the noise and clearly see which ones are truly innovative and which are just hype.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HodlAndChill
· 7h ago
Theories are all correct, but in reality, 99% of projects can't even pass the first question; they are just false demands.
View OriginalReply0
NFTFreezer
· 7h ago
Exactly right, many projects survive just by blowing smoke
A fancy white paper is useless; what's important is whether the team has actual delivery capability
The economic model is the easiest to be fooled by; many projects' inflation has already gone out of control
The problem is that most people don't ask these five questions at all and just follow the trend to buy
Decentralized governance? Ha, most projects are still controlled by major stakeholders
View OriginalReply0
YieldWhisperer
· 7h ago
Sounds good, but 99% of projects fail at the economic model stage.
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxBuster
· 7h ago
Sounds nice, but I’ve invested in so many crappy projects, and no framework can save them.
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamer
· 7h ago
Honestly, 90% of project whitepapers are nonsense. Analyzing the economic model is the most important.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 7h ago
Well said, but the reality is that 90% of people who read these 5 questions still end up trapped.
View OriginalReply0
LightningWallet
· 7h ago
Basically, it's the same old trick: a bunch of nonsense in the white paper. Projects that can actually make money have long been scooped up by institutions.
How to evaluate crypto projects like a professional venture capitalist?
When you get a new project, many people don't know where to start. Actually, as long as you clarify a few key questions, you can tell whether the project is truly valuable.
First, clarify the basic information of the project and token—name, token symbol, current market cap, and how much you plan to invest. These data points may seem simple, but they can help you quickly assess risk benchmarks.
Next comes the hardcore analysis. First question: what real problem does this thing actually solve? Don't be fooled by the white paper; ask yourself whether anyone truly needs this technology. Second question: how is the code and product quality? Has it been audited, and is the development team reliable? Third question: what does the competitive landscape look like? What similar projects are already in the market, and how does ours differ? Fourth question: is the economic model sustainable? Is the token distribution reasonable, and will the incentive mechanisms lead to long-term inflation? Fifth question: is the community and governance sufficiently decentralized? Is the team's power concentrated, and do token holders have real influence?
Using this framework to evaluate projects can filter out the noise and clearly see which ones are truly innovative and which are just hype.