People often get sold on the idea of high availability in centralized cloud ecosystems, but here's what's really happening behind the scenes—those supposedly separate regions? Still operating under the same provider's control plane, sharing identical governance frameworks and policies.
That's where the illusion breaks down. You're not actually diversifying risk when everything funnels through a single entity's decision-making infrastructure.
Flux deployments tell a different story. By operating across multiple independent infrastructure owners, you sidestep that single point of failure entirely. Real resilience doesn't come from coloring different zones on a map—it comes from genuinely independent network participants and autonomous governance models.
It's the difference between fragmentation and actual decentralization.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
bridgeOops
· 01-19 14:55
I've seen through this "multi-region" trick of cloud providers a long time ago. To put it simply, it's still a monopoly.
View OriginalReply0
SigmaValidator
· 01-19 14:53
Centralization disguised as decentralization can really fool people... Single points of failure are always unavoidable.
View OriginalReply0
unrekt.eth
· 01-19 14:44
The cloud service provider's "multi-region" trick, to put it plainly, is just a different flavor of the same old story—single points of failure remain single points of failure.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothing
· 01-19 14:43
It's that same "multi-region" hype again... Thinking about it carefully, it's really useless; in the end, one company makes the decisions.
View OriginalReply0
SmartMoneyWallet
· 01-19 14:43
After looking for a while, I finally understand that multi-region is just a different shell; the control still lies with the same entity... This trick has been played out by the big whales long ago.
True decentralization depends on on-chain data; Flux, with multiple independent nodes, is the right way.
People often get sold on the idea of high availability in centralized cloud ecosystems, but here's what's really happening behind the scenes—those supposedly separate regions? Still operating under the same provider's control plane, sharing identical governance frameworks and policies.
That's where the illusion breaks down. You're not actually diversifying risk when everything funnels through a single entity's decision-making infrastructure.
Flux deployments tell a different story. By operating across multiple independent infrastructure owners, you sidestep that single point of failure entirely. Real resilience doesn't come from coloring different zones on a map—it comes from genuinely independent network participants and autonomous governance models.
It's the difference between fragmentation and actual decentralization.