Gold just smashed another all-time high. The surge came right after fresh tariff threats targeting European nations over the Greenland situation. Quite the timing, right?
Here's what caught everyone's attention: gold wrapped up 2025 with a staggering 64% gain. That's massive. But now the real question hits different—can this bull run keep going, or are we finally looking at a pullback?
The answer isn't straightforward. Trade tensions and geopolitical uncertainty typically act as tailwinds for precious metals. But when you've already run up this hard, momentum alone won't sustain it forever. You need either fresh catalysts or a widening appetite for safe-haven assets.
What makes this interesting for portfolio builders: gold's recent performance raises the classic debate about diversification. When traditional hedges move this far, do they still serve their purpose? Or do you need to rethink how you balance risk in a world where policy surprises keep reshaping market dynamics?
The fundamentals supporting gold remain intact—macro uncertainty, currency moves, and inflation concerns. Whether that translates to continued outperformance or a consolidation phase will depend heavily on how trade negotiations actually unfold.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HalfPositionRunner
· 18h ago
64% increase... Oh my, is this crazy, or am I just falling behind the rhythm?
As soon as the tariff threat was announced, the gold price took off. This trick has been played out... but on the other hand, it’s indeed a bit intense.
The problem is, now that we’re at this level, are there enough bullets left for what’s to come? I always feel like I’m waiting for that inflection point to appear.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhobia
· 19h ago
A 64% increase is indeed impressive, but now those chasing the high should be cautious... The balance of risk vs. reward is tilted.
---
The Greenland Island storm has fueled the risk aversion sentiment. How long this wave can sustain is really uncertain. Don’t be fooled by the illusion of geopolitical stability.
---
Gold prices hit new highs but there are no new stories. The next step depends on how trade negotiations unfold, otherwise it’s a sign of a top.
---
The rapid pace of portfolio hedging assets actually causes more panic... It might be time to reduce positions.
---
Gold prices starting 2025 so aggressively is not a good sign. Usually, assets that rise this fast tend to cause trouble afterward.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityLarry
· 19h ago
A 64% increase is really incredible... But how long can this crazy rise last? It seems that the key still depends on how the negotiations go; otherwise, it will have to consolidate.
Gold just smashed another all-time high. The surge came right after fresh tariff threats targeting European nations over the Greenland situation. Quite the timing, right?
Here's what caught everyone's attention: gold wrapped up 2025 with a staggering 64% gain. That's massive. But now the real question hits different—can this bull run keep going, or are we finally looking at a pullback?
The answer isn't straightforward. Trade tensions and geopolitical uncertainty typically act as tailwinds for precious metals. But when you've already run up this hard, momentum alone won't sustain it forever. You need either fresh catalysts or a widening appetite for safe-haven assets.
What makes this interesting for portfolio builders: gold's recent performance raises the classic debate about diversification. When traditional hedges move this far, do they still serve their purpose? Or do you need to rethink how you balance risk in a world where policy surprises keep reshaping market dynamics?
The fundamentals supporting gold remain intact—macro uncertainty, currency moves, and inflation concerns. Whether that translates to continued outperformance or a consolidation phase will depend heavily on how trade negotiations actually unfold.