2026-01-19 23:34:05

Web3 data is exploding, and a truly reliable home is needed. In the decentralized storage sector, low cost and security are often a trade-off— but this is precisely where the bottleneck lies.

Distributed storage protocols optimize storage efficiency, enabling developers to handle massive amounts of data at lower costs, which is crucial for the scalability of the entire application ecosystem. When storage is no longer a limiting factor, the imagination space for dApps opens up.

From a technical perspective, efficient management of on-chain data is becoming the key to whether Web3 can achieve large-scale applications. Decentralized storage solutions make this future feasible—not only in theory but also as a practically deployable direction. The improvement of this infrastructure will directly drive the next wave of Web3 applications.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TokenDustCollector

· 6h ago

That's right, storage is really the bottleneck, and balancing cost and security has always been an issue. Wait, can it really be both cheap and secure? That sounds a bit too good to be true. Low cost and high security—I'll need to see real data to believe it. Words are easy, but the key is how well it actually works in practice. Whether distributed storage is popular or not still depends on whether there are real applications using it.

View OriginalReply0

ProbablyNothing

· 15h ago

Is it really so hard to choose between cheap and safe? Can cost and security truly be achieved simultaneously? Is distributed storage reliable this time? It sounds good in theory, but what about when it’s actually running? Low cost sounds great, but I’m worried about issues arising Web3 is probably still in the pie-in-the-sky stage haha Can storage costs really be reduced?

View OriginalReply0

DuskSurfer

· 01-20 00:04

Storage costs are really a bottleneck, but on the other hand, there aren't many reliable solutions.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-e19e9c10

· 01-20 00:03

Basically, storage has always been the bottleneck, but now we've finally found a direction. Cheap and secure? Can we really achieve both at the same time? Haha Are those Filecoin folks secretly celebrating? Once this thing truly matures, it’s probably going to explode. But to be honest, just having storage isn’t enough.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropChaser

· 01-20 00:01

To be honest, storage is really a bottleneck. Balancing cost and security depends on who can break through first. Lower costs raise security concerns, while enhanced security makes expenses prohibitively high. Anyway, there's no perfect solution yet. Only when distributed storage is truly widespread can the dApp ecosystem breathe. Right now, it's still too limited. That said, who will be the first to succeed? It feels like everyone is still exploring.

View OriginalReply0

LowCapGemHunter

· 01-19 23:39

Exactly right, storage costs are indeed the bottleneck Everyone wants a solution that is low-cost, secure, and good, but the key is to make it truly implementable Actually, we're just waiting for that protocol that can balance both sides Sounds good, but how does it perform in practice? Well, isn't this just the time to fill in the infrastructure gaps

View OriginalReply0