Recently, I came across an industry overview and found that the retreat of high-valuation projects supported by VC is indeed shocking. Take Eclipse as an example, with a valuation of up to $1 billion during fundraising, but it dropped to as low as $70 million, a decline of over 90%. Such cases are not uncommon.
When many people invested in these types of projects initially, the core logic was to focus on VC backing, fundraising amount, and valuation size. But in reality, large fundraising scales and high valuations do not guarantee long-term project performance. The primary market has also exposed many similar cases.
This reflects that the entire market may over-rely on fundraising signals when evaluating early-stage projects, while neglecting the actual progress of project implementation. When market sentiment reverses and liquidity tightens, these high-valuation projects are often the first to be affected. Whether in primary or secondary markets, investors need to evaluate the true value and growth logic of projects more cautiously.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ReverseTradingGuru
· 4h ago
90% decline... VC backing can't save it either, which is why I never only look at funding news.
To be honest, the Eclipse case was too typical. At the time, so many people rushed in just because the valuation looked good, but what happened then?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHunter
· 9h ago
VC endorsement = insurance? Laughable, Eclipse just slapped them in the face. A large funding amount does not equal successful product implementation. Do they need such a painful lesson to understand such a simple truth?
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter
· 9h ago
ngl the vc signal trap is real... Eclipse down 93% tells u everything about how broken primary market pricing is rn. ppl were literally just stacking on brand names and fundraising theater lmao
Reply0
GateUser-9ad11037
· 9h ago
That's why I just scroll past funding news now... VC endorsements really don't hold up, Eclipse's recent wave truly couldn't hold on anymore.
Recently, I came across an industry overview and found that the retreat of high-valuation projects supported by VC is indeed shocking. Take Eclipse as an example, with a valuation of up to $1 billion during fundraising, but it dropped to as low as $70 million, a decline of over 90%. Such cases are not uncommon.
When many people invested in these types of projects initially, the core logic was to focus on VC backing, fundraising amount, and valuation size. But in reality, large fundraising scales and high valuations do not guarantee long-term project performance. The primary market has also exposed many similar cases.
This reflects that the entire market may over-rely on fundraising signals when evaluating early-stage projects, while neglecting the actual progress of project implementation. When market sentiment reverses and liquidity tightens, these high-valuation projects are often the first to be affected. Whether in primary or secondary markets, investors need to evaluate the true value and growth logic of projects more cautiously.