This month saw several major corporate leaders voicing measured pushback against some policy directions. Exxon Mobil's Darren Woods and JPMorgan's Jamie Dimon both weighed in with careful critiques. Here's the interesting part though—they kept their commentary strictly within their wheelhouse. Woods spoke up about Venezuela's oil situation, while Dimon focused on Federal Reserve matters affecting the financial sector. It's a telling pattern: executives are willing to challenge the agenda, but only where their bottom line is directly exposed. Classic move—protect your interests, stay politically smart.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ThesisInvestorvip
· 4h ago
Basically, it's just capitalists protecting their own interests; they only dare to bite the food on their own plate. I've seen through Woods and Dimon's tactics a long time ago.
View OriginalReply0
Anon4461vip
· 7h ago
Basically, everyone is doing their own thing, just shouting within their own territory. Woods is concerned about Venezuelan oil, Dimon is closely watching the Federal Reserve, and they all tacitly avoid truly offending topics, maximizing their interests. Nothing new.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractDivervip
· 7h ago
Basically, everyone is doing their own thing, and the only time they speak up is when their own interests are touched. Dimon understands, Woods understands too, it's just "courage" under the influence of利益绑架.
View OriginalReply0
CoinBasedThinkingvip
· 7h ago
Basically, it's just biting their own cake, don't expect them to really challenge anything.
View OriginalReply0
DAOplomacyvip
· 7h ago
ngl the incentive structures here are pretty non-trivial... like, historical precedent suggests execs only get spicy when their margins are threatened. woods and dimon basically just playing 4d chess with selective transparency tbh. classic stakeholder alignment problem dressed up as principled critique, right?
Reply0
token_therapistvip
· 7h ago
Basically, everyone is just talking their own way. As long as it touches the wallet, they dare to speak up. What about the others? Playing deaf and mute.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTradervip
· 7h ago
Ha, isn't it all for your own pocket? No matter how eloquently you put it, that can't be changed.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)