When a handful of mega corporations control the game, the whole system shifts. Fewer players means fewer bets hitting the market. More importantly? Decision-making becomes centralized—concentrated in the hands of a few executives rather than distributed across a competitive landscape.
This is the real problem with Big Tech dominance. It's not just about market share numbers. It's about how capital flows, where innovation actually happens, and who gets to decide what matters next. When you've got that kind of centralization, you lose the friction, the competing ideas, the constant pressure to adapt and improve.
In crypto and decentralized finance, we talk a lot about avoiding these exact patterns. But it's worth watching how traditional markets mirror these same consolidation risks. The fewer independent voices making bets, the fewer opportunities for markets to discover real value.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DeepRabbitHole
· 8h ago
Big corporations' monopoly—this is just the centralized issue in crypto wearing a different mask, truly ironic
View OriginalReply0
ChainSherlockGirl
· 8h ago
Big monopoly, as if I couldn't see through it. The traditional finance folks are already tired of it, and now some people are starting to lay the groundwork in crypto. Based on my analysis, this is not the end yet.
View OriginalReply0
ForkTongue
· 8h ago
Isn't this the problem that Web3 keeps complaining about? Now our crypto space is just repeating the same old tricks.
Centralized giants control everything, and truly innovative small players have no voice. Wake up, everyone.
Big corporations monopolize what? Innovation? The whole system now feels like it's frozen.
Speaking of which, we're already tired of the traditional financial system, and we're just worried that the crypto space might also fall into the same trap.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-ccc36bc5
· 8h ago
That's why I've always been optimistic about on-chain governance. The centralized approach should have been phased out long ago.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-4745f9ce
· 8h ago
Basically, it's just giant corporations monopolizing, innovation dead, and the market also dead.
View OriginalReply0
GasDevourer
· 8h ago
Bro, your words hit right in my heart. That old-fashioned oligopoly monopoly of traditional finance is trash. Crypto is here to break that system.
When a handful of mega corporations control the game, the whole system shifts. Fewer players means fewer bets hitting the market. More importantly? Decision-making becomes centralized—concentrated in the hands of a few executives rather than distributed across a competitive landscape.
This is the real problem with Big Tech dominance. It's not just about market share numbers. It's about how capital flows, where innovation actually happens, and who gets to decide what matters next. When you've got that kind of centralization, you lose the friction, the competing ideas, the constant pressure to adapt and improve.
In crypto and decentralized finance, we talk a lot about avoiding these exact patterns. But it's worth watching how traditional markets mirror these same consolidation risks. The fewer independent voices making bets, the fewer opportunities for markets to discover real value.