2026-01-21 06:22:08

Many community members habitually bring a leading exchange into discussions when disputes involving competitors arise. Frankly, this can easily lead to misunderstandings from outsiders. If you have opinions about the parties involved, it's more efficient and respectful to directly provide feedback to their company.

I want to clarify a few positions:

First, the exchange is indeed very busy. The team's main focus is on ecosystem development, product iteration, and strategic project advancement, and they truly have no bandwidth to pay attention to or intervene in these peripheral disputes. This is not indifference, but focus.

Second, if the team has opinions about peers, we have always been frank and straightforward. We do not hide behind the scenes or communicate through third parties — that’s not our style.

Overall, everyone should do their own thing well so that the industry can be healthier. We hope the community can understand this as well.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

YieldWhisperer

· 3h ago

ngl the "we're too busy building" excuse hits different when you've got time for quarterly earnings calls. seen this exact playbook before—2021 called, wants its deflection strategy back

Reply0

LiquidationWatcher

· 3h ago

ngl this "stay focused, don't get dragged in" thing hits different when everyone's literally screaming for exchanges to pick sides... been there though, seen teams get absolutely wrecked by getting caught in drama instead of watching their health factors, u know? respect the boundaries tbh, that's how positions don't liquidate

Reply0

CoffeeNFTs

· 3h ago

Don't always think about dragging big players into the water, just say it directly. It's a bit boring, always creating these hot-button issues. This approach is correct; focusing on your own affairs is the right way. Doing this every day, no wonder the community is chaotic. You're not wrong; direct feedback is much better than gossiping behind people's backs. Really just bored and looking for trouble. Won't mentioning the exchange's name kill you? That's a bit too deliberate. Just normal operation, yet you have to bring up conspiracy theories. Self-purification like this is necessary, or you'll be demonized every day.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainDetective

· 3h ago

Hmm... After on-chain data tracking and analysis, the logic of this explanation is indeed interesting. Saying there's no bandwidth to focus on disputes, but claiming "won't hide behind the scenes"... How can these two points be true at the same time?

View OriginalReply0

MerkleMaid

· 3h ago

Really, don't always bring big exchanges into everything. They're busy enough. Wouldn't it be clearer to just report directly to the official? Why spread gossip about gossip? I quite agree with this logic; everyone should do their own thing.

View OriginalReply0

SilentAlpha

· 3h ago

Stop talking nonsense, just do your own thing, really. --- You're right, sometimes the community just loves to make up stories. --- Just listen, don't take it seriously or spread rumors. --- That logic makes sense, if anyone has objections, just communicate directly. --- Got it, it means don't get involved in this just because you're bored. --- Anyway, I'll just watch how you develop the product, everything else is just clouds.

View OriginalReply0