2026-01-21 13:21:18

Recently on the BSC chain, there has been an interesting phenomenon: the liquidity of small tokens is heavily concentrated in two pools. These two projects behave strangely—when one rises, the other falls, and vice versa, in a cyclical pattern. Other tokens hardly have any presence during this period, as if they have been neglected.

Looking at this rhythm, it's hard not to wonder if the same manipulator is controlling it. The tactic of switching hands between buy and sell is indeed easy to implement on such small-cap tokens with scarce liquidity. One side accumulates and pumps, while the other volume dumps, and funds cut the leeks between these two. Such phenomena are not uncommon in the BSC ecosystem; retail investors should keep their eyes open.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RugPullAlertBot

· 17m ago

I've seen this routine too many times, the game of tug-of-war, retail investors are just the ATMs between those two pools. --- It's the same old trick, when small-cap liquidity concentrates, strange fluctuations begin. Everyone with a clear eye can see through it. --- In the BSC ecosystem, it's truly a battlefield. The whales perform a public show of tug-of-war, and we're just here to watch. --- Damn, here they come again? These two coins always coordinate, moving funds back and forth between them, while other tokens are completely trapped. --- Liquidity scarcity is the paradise for these whales. When they pull and smash the two pools, the retail investors are still bottom-fishing, it's hilarious. --- You really need to keep your eyes open, but honestly, small caps are like this—whoever falls in is just unlucky. --- Why does it feel like the small coins on BSC are always acting? One rises, one falls, the rhythm is incredibly regular. --- This phenomenon isn't recent, I've seen it several times last year. The whales' tricks haven't changed. --- Retail investors are truly wronged. Funds are being squeezed from both sides by two projects, no matter how you play, it’s uncomfortable.

View OriginalReply0

NotFinancialAdvice

· 12h ago

I've seen this trick a long time ago, just two groups working together to harvest retail investors. Playing with both hands skillfully, small investors always get caught no matter how they choose. In the BSC environment, without some awareness of prevention, you really can't survive. Is it the same pump master again? It's exhausting to watch.

View OriginalReply0

metaverse_hermit

· 12h ago

Typical head-to-head combat, this routine is played very skillfully on small caps. --- Here we go again, liquidity has been drained, retail investors are still sleepwalking. --- Damn, this is the legendary "two-hand reversal," funds are being cut back and forth between two pools. You think you're trading, but you're actually being slaughtered. --- Why are there so many weird issues in the BSC ecosystem? Is it the same on other chains, or is this one especially lucrative? --- No wonder those small coins have been dying so quickly lately, they are all dominated by these two. --- One goes up, the other down, cycle repeats... I'm tired of this script. When will retail investors get a turn to win? --- Liquidity concentration = capital concentration, capital concentration = paradise for leek farmers. The logic is very clear. --- This is truly incredible. It looks like two projects, but in reality, one person is controlling both with two hands. --- I just want to know how much this guy needs to earn to stop, destroying the entire small cap ecosystem. --- Wake up, everyone. This is why I stopped touching small coins long ago—they're too dirty.

View OriginalReply0

ForkTongue

· 12h ago

These two coins are obviously controlled by the same person. It's so obvious. One hand sells while the other buys, taking advantage of the waves. Small-cap coins are just like this. In the BSC ecosystem, you need to be more cautious. It's the same old tricks. When will it stop? The market maker's moves this time are indeed incredible. Retail investors can only watch themselves get cut. Liquidity has been drained, and other coins have become just a backdrop. Small-cap leek fields, avoid them. Playing this rhythm repeatedly, funds are moving back and forth between the two coins.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoMotivator

· 12h ago

I'm already tired of this routine, small-cap liquidity scarcity is truly a paradise for the whales. --- The same trick of switching hands works perfectly on BSC; retail investors are still there catching the bag. --- It's another strange reverse trend, it feels like the entire BSC small coin pool has been messed up. --- It's always like this, two coins go up and down, and funds cut the leeks in the middle. So annoying. --- BSC small caps have really become a playground for the big players; we retail investors are just lambs waiting to be slaughtered. --- After seeing through this routine, I won't touch small caps anymore; the speed of cutting losses is just too damn fast. --- Liquidity concentration is a signal, everyone. Be alert. --- Why does it feel like BSC is playing the same script every month, without even bothering to change it? --- A typical game of capital, retail participation in small caps really requires a gambler's mentality.

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 12h ago

According to on-chain data, this type of inverse correlation phenomenon occurs frequently when the concentration of small-cap TVL exceeds 60%, which is worth vigilance. --- Left hand to right hand, a classic wash trading tactic. The scarier the liquidity shortage, the easier it is to manipulate. Retail investors are still watching K-line charts while the whales have already run away. --- The specific analysis is as follows: transaction patterns of individual addresses, gas consumption frequency, entry and exit time differences... these data points together can basically reveal the clues. --- This phenomenon on BSC is actually not uncommon, but what’s more frightening is that no one is tracking this data; most people are still guessing blindly. --- From three dimensions: first, liquidity concentration; second, price correlation coefficient; third, trading frequency of large addresses. When these three dimensions all show anomalies, be cautious. --- Risk warning: The more attractive the APY of small-cap coins, the deeper the trap usually is. Historical data has verified this. --- Based on on-chain data, an correlation coefficient exceeding 0.85 between these two projects is no longer a coincidence. It is recommended to focus on monitoring the time difference between entry and exit.

View OriginalReply0